Ad is loading...
EGMSX vs NTBIX
EGMSX vs NTBIX Comparison
Open Charts EGMSX vs NTBIX
Eaton Vance Glb Macr Absolt Retrn R6
Price$8.50
Change-$0.04 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.01B
Navigator Tactical Fixed Income I
Price$9.44
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.51B
EGMSX vs NTBIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EGMSX vs. NTBIX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EGMSX is a Hold and NTBIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NTBIX has more cash in the bank: 7.51B vs. EGMSX (2.01B). EGMSX (6.16) and NTBIX (6.15) have matching dividends . EGMSX was incepted earlier than NTBIX: EGMSX (8 years) vs NTBIX (11 years). EGMSX (1.14) and NTBIX (1.09) have similar cost to investors . EGMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 156.00 vs. NTBIX (34.00). NTBIX has a lower initial minimum investment than EGMSX: NTBIX (25000) vs EGMSX (5000000). EGMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.67 vs. NTBIX (2.57). EGMSX return over 5 years is better than : 30.45 vs. NTBIX (8.92).
| EGMSX | NTBIX | EGMSX / NTBIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.07 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.09 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.239 | -3.452 | -94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 25000 | 20,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.01B | 7.51B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.16 | 6.15 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.67 | 2.57 | 298% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.06 | 9.93 | 212% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.45 | 8.92 | 341% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 35.75 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...