Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EGMSX vs NTBIX
EGMSX vs NTBIX Comparison
Open Charts EGMSX vs NTBIX
Eaton Vance Glb Macr Absolt Retrn R6
Price$8.63
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.37B
Navigator Tactical Fixed Income I
Price$9.58
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.62B
EGMSX vs NTBIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EGMSX vs. NTBIX commentary
Jul 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EGMSX is a Hold and NTBIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NTBIX has more cash in the bank: 7.62B vs. EGMSX (2.37B). EGMSX (6.09) and NTBIX (6.03) have matching dividends . EGMSX was incepted earlier than NTBIX: EGMSX (8 years) vs NTBIX (11 years). EGMSX (1.14) and NTBIX (1.09) have similar cost to investors . EGMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 156.00 vs. NTBIX (34.00). NTBIX has a lower initial minimum investment than EGMSX: NTBIX (25000) vs EGMSX (5000000). EGMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.52 vs. NTBIX (3.01). EGMSX return over 5 years is better than : 29.28 vs. NTBIX (9.69).
| EGMSX | NTBIX | EGMSX / NTBIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.07 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.09 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.804 | -0.587 | -990% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 25000 | 20,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.37B | 7.62B | 31% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.09 | 6.03 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.52 | 3.01 | 283% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.64 | 20.34 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.28 | 9.69 | 302% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 41.14 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers