Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EGMSX vs PADZX
EGMSX vs PADZX Comparison
Open Charts EGMSX vs PADZX
Eaton Vance Glb Macr Absolt Retrn R6
Price$8.63
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.37B
PGIM Absolute Return Bond Z
Price$9.15
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.5B
EGMSX vs PADZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EGMSX vs. PADZX commentary
Jul 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EGMSX is a Hold and PADZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PADZX has more cash in the bank: 3.5B vs. EGMSX (2.37B). EGMSX pays higher dividends than PADZX: EGMSX (6.09) vs PADZX (5.21). EGMSX was incepted earlier than PADZX: EGMSX (8 years) vs PADZX (14 years). EGMSX (1.14) is less costly to investors than PADZX (0.73). EGMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 156.00 vs. PADZX (77.00). PADZX has a lower initial minimum investment than EGMSX: PADZX (0) vs EGMSX (5000000). EGMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.52 vs. PADZX (5.71). EGMSX return over 5 years is better than : 29.28 vs. PADZX (27.50).
| EGMSX | PADZX | EGMSX / PADZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.73 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.73 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.804 | 2.159 | 269% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.37B | 3.5B | 68% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.09 | 5.21 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.52 | 5.71 | 149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.64 | 21.32 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.28 | 27.50 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 40.46 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement