Ad is loading...
EGMSX vs PADZX
EGMSX vs PADZX Comparison
Open Charts EGMSX vs PADZX
Eaton Vance Glb Macr Absolt Retrn R6
Price$8.50
Change-$0.04 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.01B
PGIM Absolute Return Bond Z
Price$9.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.4B
EGMSX vs PADZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EGMSX vs. PADZX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EGMSX is a Hold and PADZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PADZX has more cash in the bank: 3.4B vs. EGMSX (2.01B). EGMSX pays higher dividends than PADZX: EGMSX (6.16) vs PADZX (5.38). EGMSX was incepted earlier than PADZX: EGMSX (8 years) vs PADZX (14 years). EGMSX (1.14) is less costly to investors than PADZX (0.73). EGMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 156.00 vs. PADZX (77.00). PADZX has a lower initial minimum investment than EGMSX: PADZX (0) vs EGMSX (5000000). EGMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.67 vs. PADZX (5.44). PADZX return over 5 years is better than : 33.46 vs. EGMSX (30.45).
| EGMSX | PADZX | EGMSX / PADZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.73 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.73 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.239 | 0.448 | 724% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.01B | 3.4B | 59% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.16 | 5.38 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.67 | 5.44 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.06 | 17.20 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.45 | 33.46 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 36.85 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...