EGO
Price
$19.88
Change
-$0.71 (-3.45%)
Updated
Jun 27, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.86B
34 days until earnings call
FNMCF
Price
$0.27
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

EGO vs FNMCF

Header iconEGO vs FNMCF Comparison
Open Charts EGO vs FNMCFBanner chart's image
Eldorado Gold
Price$19.88
Change-$0.71 (-3.45%)
Volume$27.88K
Capitalization2.86B
FIRST NORDIC METALS
Price$0.27
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$296.73K
CapitalizationN/A
EGO vs FNMCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EGO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EGO vs. FNMCF commentary
Jun 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EGO is a Hold and FNMCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2025
Stock price -- (EGO: $20.59 vs. FNMCF: $0.27)
Brand notoriety: EGO and FNMCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EGO: 70% vs. FNMCF: 234%
Market capitalization -- EGO: $2.86B vs. FNMCF: $0
EGO [@Precious Metals] is valued at $2.86B. FNMCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EGO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFNMCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EGO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FNMCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EGO is a better buy in the long-term than FNMCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EGO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNMCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EGO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FNMCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both EGO and FNMCF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

EGO (@Precious Metals) experienced а -1.62% price change this week, while FNMCF (@Precious Metals) price change was -0.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +1.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.64%.

Reported Earning Dates

EGO is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+1.00% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EGO YTD gains are higher at: 38.467 vs. FNMCF (3.200).
EGOFNMCFEGO / FNMCF
Capitalization2.86BN/A-
EBITDA458MN/A-
Gain YTD38.4673.2001,202%
P/E Ratio26.63N/A-
Revenue1.01BN/A-
Total Cash544MN/A-
Total Debt659MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EGO vs FNMCF: Fundamental Ratings
EGO
FNMCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7660
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
32100
SMR RATING
1..100
7498
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4162
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
94100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNMCF's Valuation (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EGO (86) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that FNMCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EGO’s over the last 12 months.

EGO's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for FNMCF (100) in the null industry. This means that EGO’s stock grew significantly faster than FNMCF’s over the last 12 months.

EGO's SMR Rating (74) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as FNMCF (98) in the null industry. This means that EGO’s stock grew similarly to FNMCF’s over the last 12 months.

EGO's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as FNMCF (62) in the null industry. This means that EGO’s stock grew similarly to FNMCF’s over the last 12 months.

EGO's P/E Growth Rating (94) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as FNMCF (100) in the null industry. This means that EGO’s stock grew similarly to FNMCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EGOFNMCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EGO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RTIRX12.030.12
+1.01%
Russell Inv Multifactor Intl Eq R6
BALFX36.390.27
+0.75%
American Funds American Balanced F1
EGINX35.35N/A
N/A
Invesco EQV European Equity Investor
COSZX13.04N/A
N/A
Columbia Overseas Value Inst
RAPRX10.94N/A
N/A
Cohen & Steers Real Assets R

FNMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNMCF and FFMGF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNMCF and FFMGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNMCF
1D Price
Change %
FNMCF100%
+2.30%
FFMGF - FNMCF
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.67%
EGO - FNMCF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.54%
PPTA - FNMCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.53%
ORFDF - FNMCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KSSRF - FNMCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More