Advertisement
EGPLF vs KVLQF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EGPLF is a Hold and KVLQF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EGPLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKVLQF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- EGPLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- KVLQF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
EGPLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +4.37% price change this week, while KVLQF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +16.20% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.50%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.24% weekly)The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
| EGPLF | KVLQF | EGPLF / KVLQF | |
| Capitalization | 9.37M | 5.15M | 182% |
| EBITDA | -1.15M | 24.5M | -5% |
| Gain YTD | 19.799 | 11.224 | 176% |
| P/E Ratio | 34.84 | 0.30 | 11,711% |
| Revenue | 13.4M | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 9.91M | 70.5K | 14,052% |
| Total Debt | 1.69K | 50K | 3% |
EGPLF | KVLQF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 32 | 33 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 45 Fair valued | 41 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 98 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 23 | 15 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KVLQF's Valuation (41) in the null industry is in the same range as EGPLF (45). This means that KVLQF’s stock grew similarly to EGPLF’s over the last 12 months.
EGPLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as KVLQF (100). This means that EGPLF’s stock grew similarly to KVLQF’s over the last 12 months.
EGPLF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as KVLQF (100). This means that EGPLF’s stock grew similarly to KVLQF’s over the last 12 months.
KVLQF's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as EGPLF (62). This means that KVLQF’s stock grew similarly to EGPLF’s over the last 12 months.
KVLQF's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as EGPLF (23). This means that KVLQF’s stock grew similarly to EGPLF’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RPTTX | 48.61 | N/A | N/A |
| T. Rowe Price Diversified Mid Cap Gr I | |||
| LBWIX | 20.60 | N/A | N/A |
| BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value I | |||
| DODFX | 58.77 | -0.32 | -0.54% |
| Dodge & Cox International Stock I | |||
| MCTRX | 20.98 | -0.23 | -1.08% |
| NYLI Income Builder Class C | |||
| MLVOX | 19.08 | -0.24 | -1.24% |
| MFS Low Volatility Equity R2 | |||
EGPLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EGPLF and MLGCF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EGPLF and MLGCF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EGPLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EGPLF | 100% | +0.60% | ||
| MLGCF - EGPLF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DWMNF - EGPLF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KVLQF - EGPLF | 21% Poorly correlated | +9.22% | ||
| LTRBF - EGPLF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GOCOF - EGPLF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
KVLQF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that KVLQF and SCCO have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KVLQF and SCCO's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KVLQF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KVLQF | 100% | +9.22% | ||
| SCCO - KVLQF | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.81% | ||
| CSCCF - KVLQF | 23% Poorly correlated | +3.64% | ||
| VALE - KVLQF | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.33% | ||
| PGZFF - KVLQF | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.06% | ||
| SRLZF - KVLQF | 22% Poorly correlated | -2.04% | ||
More | ||||