Ad is loading...
EHSTX vs RMEBX
EHSTX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts EHSTX vs RMEBX
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value A
Price$25.36
Change-$0.30 (-1.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.47B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$55.55
Change-$0.62 (-1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets101.47B
EHSTX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EHSTX vs. RMEBX commentary
Mar 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EHSTX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. EHSTX (1.47B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than EHSTX: RMEBX (1.15) vs EHSTX (0.94). EHSTX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: EHSTX (94 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) and EHSTX (1.03) have similar cost to investors . EHSTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EHSTX: RMEBX (250) vs EHSTX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.88 vs. EHSTX (0.50). EHSTX (72.48) and RMEBX (72.28) have equivalent 5 years return.
| EHSTX | RMEBX | EHSTX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.07 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.07 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 94 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.210 | 1.459 | 14% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.47B | 101B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 1.15 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.50 | 3.88 | 13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.01 | 8.55 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.48 | 72.28 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.47 | 62.13 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...