Ad is loading...
EHSTX vs RMFEX
EHSTX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts EHSTX vs RMFEX
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value A
Price$25.05
Change+$0.05 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.34B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$55.34
Change-$0.12 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.86B
EHSTX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EHSTX vs. RMFEX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EHSTX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. EHSTX (1.34B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than EHSTX: RMFEX (1.65) vs EHSTX (1.07). EHSTX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: EHSTX (94 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). EHSTX (1.03) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). EHSTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than EHSTX: RMFEX (250) vs EHSTX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.72 vs. EHSTX (-1.08). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 58.22 vs. EHSTX (51.34).
| EHSTX | RMFEX | EHSTX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.62 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.62 | 166% |
| Fund Existence | 94 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.015 | 1.154 | -88% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.34B | 101B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.65 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.08 | 4.72 | -23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.52 | 18.36 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.34 | 58.22 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.01 | 66.67 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...