Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EHSTX vs RMFEX
EHSTX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts EHSTX vs RMFEX
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value A
Price$25.95
Change+$0.25 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.39B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$58.02
Change+$0.32 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
EHSTX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EHSTX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EHSTX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. EHSTX (1.39B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than EHSTX: RMFEX (1.58) vs EHSTX (1.02). EHSTX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: EHSTX (94 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). EHSTX (1.00) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). EHSTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than EHSTX: RMFEX (250) vs EHSTX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.37 vs. EHSTX (2.16). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 54.01 vs. EHSTX (39.81).
| EHSTX | RMFEX | EHSTX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.62 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.62 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 94 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.553 | 6.053 | 26% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 105B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 1.58 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.16 | 9.37 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.48 | 18.90 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.81 | 54.01 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.64 | 77.06 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement