Ad is loading...
EHSTX vs RMFEX
EHSTX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts EHSTX vs RMFEX
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value A
Price$25.36
Change-$0.30 (-1.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.47B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$55.57
Change-$0.61 (-1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets101.47B
EHSTX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EHSTX vs. RMFEX commentary
Mar 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EHSTX is a StrongBuy and RMFEX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. EHSTX (1.47B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than EHSTX: RMFEX (1.56) vs EHSTX (0.94). EHSTX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: EHSTX (94 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). EHSTX (1.03) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). EHSTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than EHSTX: RMFEX (250) vs EHSTX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.34 vs. EHSTX (0.50). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 76.22 vs. EHSTX (72.48).
| EHSTX | RMFEX | EHSTX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.62 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.62 | 166% |
| Fund Existence | 94 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.210 | 1.575 | 13% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.47B | 101B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 1.56 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.50 | 4.34 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.01 | 10.03 | 30% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.48 | 76.22 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.47 | 69.86 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...