EICCF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
NAAS
Price
$2.77
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Ad is loading...

EICCF vs NAAS

Header iconEICCF vs NAAS Comparison
Open Charts EICCF vs NAASBanner chart's image
E Automotive
Price$0.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.27K
CapitalizationN/A
NaaS Technology
Price$2.77
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$227.92K
CapitalizationN/A
EICCF vs NAAS Comparison Chart
Loading...
NAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EICCF vs. NAAS commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EICCF is a Hold and NAAS is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (EICCF: $0.08 vs. NAAS: $2.76)
Brand notoriety: EICCF and NAAS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EICCF: 100% vs. NAAS: 123%
Market capitalization -- EICCF: $132.87M vs. NAAS: $319.39M
EICCF [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $132.87M. NAAS’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $319.39M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EICCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNAAS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EICCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NAAS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EICCF is a better buy in the long-term than NAAS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NAAS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • NAAS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

EICCF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NAAS (@Specialty Stores) price change was -5.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

NAAS is expected to report earnings on Jul 25, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-2.12% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAAS($319M) has a higher market cap than EICCF($133M). EICCF YTD gains are higher at: 7999900.000 vs. NAAS (-90.921). EICCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -36.28M vs. NAAS (-909.26M). NAAS has more cash in the bank: 703M vs. EICCF (15.8M). EICCF has less debt than NAAS: EICCF (14M) vs NAAS (1.22B). NAAS has higher revenues than EICCF: NAAS (285M) vs EICCF (116M).
EICCFNAASEICCF / NAAS
Capitalization133M319M42%
EBITDA-36.28M-909.26M4%
Gain YTD7999900.000-90.921-8,798,733%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue116M285M41%
Total Cash15.8M703M2%
Total Debt14M1.22B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NAAS: Fundamental Ratings
NAAS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
61
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
96
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NAAS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
NAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VGRIX83.57N/A
N/A
JPMorgan US Value A
KCSSX15.25N/A
N/A
Knights of Columbus Small Cap S
FAPNX13.73N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Healthy Future Z
LGOTX32.40-0.11
-0.34%
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities R5
FIICX20.38-0.10
-0.49%
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II C

EICCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EICCF has been loosely correlated with SCCAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EICCF jumps, then SCCAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EICCF
1D Price
Change %
EICCF100%
N/A
SCCAF - EICCF
54%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SIETY - EICCF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SDA - EICCF
14%
Poorly correlated
-1.91%
NAAS - EICCF
8%
Poorly correlated
+9.09%
UCAR - EICCF
2%
Poorly correlated
-4.71%
More

NAAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NAAS has been closely correlated with JZXN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NAAS jumps, then JZXN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NAAS
1D Price
Change %
NAAS100%
+9.09%
JZXN - NAAS
76%
Closely correlated
-2.13%
ODP - NAAS
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.35%
TKLF - NAAS
22%
Poorly correlated
-19.76%
KIRK - NAAS
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.21%
KMX - NAAS
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.53%
More