Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EIFHX vs TRIZX
EIFHX vs TRIZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIZX has more cash in the bank: 4.33B vs. EIFHX (766M). TRIZX pays higher dividends than EIFHX: TRIZX (8.13) vs EIFHX (7.55). EIFHX was incepted earlier than TRIZX: EIFHX (25 years) vs TRIZX (5 years). EIFHX (0.82) is less costly to investors than TRIZX (0.61). TRIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.90 vs. EIFHX (4.00). TRIZX has a lower initial minimum investment than EIFHX: TRIZX (0) vs EIFHX (1000000). TRIZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.26 vs. EIFHX (6.11). TRIZX return over 5 years is better than : 41.97 vs. EIFHX (32.83).
| EIFHX | TRIZX | EIFHX / TRIZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.02 | 4,100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.61 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.741 | 4.085 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 766M | 4.33B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.55 | 8.13 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.11 | 8.26 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.54 | 30.64 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.83 | 41.97 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.97 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement