Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EIMDX vs HICOX
EIMDX vs HICOX Comparison
Open Charts EIMDX vs HICOX
Eaton Vance MD Municipal Income I
Price$8.09
Change+$0.02 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets88.03M
Colorado BondShares A Tax-Exempt
Price$8.84
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.86B
EIMDX vs HICOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EIMDX vs. HICOX commentary
Aug 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EIMDX is a Hold and HICOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HICOX has more cash in the bank: 1.86B vs. EIMDX (88M). HICOX pays higher dividends than EIMDX: HICOX (5.44) vs EIMDX (3.45). EIMDX was incepted earlier than HICOX: EIMDX (17 years) vs HICOX (38 years). HICOX (0.60) is less costly to investors than EIMDX (0.53). EIMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. HICOX (5.58). HICOX has a lower initial minimum investment than EIMDX: HICOX (500) vs EIMDX (1000000). HICOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.93 vs. EIMDX (-1.34). HICOX return over 5 years is better than : 19.73 vs. EIMDX (-1.87).
| EIMDX | HICOX | EIMDX / HICOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.60 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.60 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.056 | 1.656 | -64% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 500 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88M | 1.86B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.45 | 5.44 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.34 | 2.93 | -46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.83 | 13.50 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.87 | 19.73 | -9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.49 | 48.63 | 5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement