Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKBAX vs FSIDX
EKBAX vs FSIDX Comparison
Open Charts EKBAX vs FSIDX
Allspring Diversified Cap Bldr A
Price$13.83
Change+$0.10 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.46B
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc I
Price$17.28
Change+$0.13 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.13B
EKBAX vs FSIDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKBAX vs. FSIDX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKBAX is a Buy and FSIDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSIDX has more cash in the bank: 5.13B vs. EKBAX (1.46B). FSIDX pays higher dividends than EKBAX: FSIDX (2.47) vs EKBAX (0.56). EKBAX was incepted earlier than FSIDX: EKBAX (27 years) vs FSIDX (21 years). EKBAX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FSIDX (0.67). FSIDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. EKBAX (30.00). FSIDX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKBAX: FSIDX (0) vs EKBAX (1000). FSIDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.16 vs. EKBAX (3.29). EKBAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.45 vs. FSIDX (30.96).
| EKBAX | FSIDX | EKBAX / FSIDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.67 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.67 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.816 | 2.834 | 29% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.46B | 5.13B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 2.47 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.29 | 6.16 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.74 | 12.56 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.45 | 30.96 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.52 | 42.79 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement