Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKBAX vs FSIDX
EKBAX vs FSIDX Comparison
Open Charts EKBAX vs FSIDX
Allspring Diversified Cap Bldr A
Price$14.49
Change+$0.15 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.52B
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc I
Price$17.39
Change+$0.10 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.13B
EKBAX vs FSIDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKBAX vs. FSIDX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKBAX is a Buy and FSIDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSIDX has more cash in the bank: 5.13B vs. EKBAX (1.52B). FSIDX pays higher dividends than EKBAX: FSIDX (2.47) vs EKBAX (0.56). EKBAX was incepted earlier than FSIDX: EKBAX (27 years) vs FSIDX (22 years). EKBAX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FSIDX (0.67). FSIDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. EKBAX (30.00). FSIDX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKBAX: FSIDX (0) vs EKBAX (1000). FSIDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.02 vs. EKBAX (5.20). EKBAX return over 5 years is better than : 49.06 vs. FSIDX (39.04).
| EKBAX | FSIDX | EKBAX / FSIDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.67 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.67 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.493 | 3.674 | 150% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.52B | 5.13B | 30% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 2.47 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.20 | 7.02 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.26 | 19.03 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.06 | 39.04 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.34 | 45.17 | 129% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement