Ad is loading...
EKJAX vs GFACX
EKJAX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts EKJAX vs GFACX
Allspring Premier Large Co Gr A
Price$9.56
Change+$0.96 (+11.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.08B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$58.83
Change+$5.60 (+10.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets245.76B
EKJAX vs GFACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKJAX vs. GFACX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKJAX is a Buy and GFACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 246B vs. EKJAX (1.08B). EKJAX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . EKJAX was incepted earlier than GFACX: EKJAX (27 years) vs GFACX (24 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than EKJAX (1.15). EKJAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKJAX: GFACX (250) vs EKJAX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.80 vs. EKJAX (-20.59). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 27.34 vs. EKJAX (-29.45).
| EKJAX | GFACX | EKJAX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.36 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.36 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -19.851 | -16.515 | 120% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.08B | 246B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -20.59 | -13.80 | 149% |
| Returns for 3 years | -32.39 | -7.38 | 439% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.45 | 27.34 | -108% |
| Returns for 10 years | -46.85 | 25.16 | -186% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...