Ad is loading...
ELBCX vs PELNX
ELBCX vs PELNX Comparison
Open Charts ELBCX vs PELNX
Ashmore Emerging Mkts Lcl Ccy Bd C
Price$6.14
Change+$0.03 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.35M
PIMCO Emerging Mkts Lcl Ccy and Bd I-3
Price$5.91
Change+$0.01 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.4B
ELBCX vs PELNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ELBCX vs. PELNX commentary
May 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ELBCX is a Hold and PELNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PELNX has more cash in the bank: 1.4B vs. ELBCX (9.35M). PELNX pays higher dividends than ELBCX: PELNX (6.93) vs ELBCX (4.66). ELBCX was incepted earlier than PELNX: ELBCX (14 years) vs PELNX (7 years). ELBCX (3.57) is less costly to investors than PELNX (2.22). PELNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 135.00 vs. ELBCX (59.00). ELBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PELNX: ELBCX (1000) vs PELNX (1000000). PELNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.77 vs. ELBCX (6.45). PELNX return over 5 years is better than : 29.92 vs. ELBCX (9.51).
| ELBCX | PELNX | ELBCX / PELNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 2.17 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.57 | 2.22 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.120 | 8.250 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.35M | 1.4B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.66 | 6.93 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.45 | 9.77 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.20 | 29.18 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.51 | 29.92 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.04 | N/A | - |