ELLH
Price
$18.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
34.77M
GRGCF
Price
$25.52
Change
+$1.00 (+4.08%)
Updated
May 20 closing price
Capitalization
863.55M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ELLH vs GRGCF

Header iconELLH vs GRGCF Comparison
Open Charts ELLH vs GRGCFBanner chart's image
Elah Holdings
Price$18.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$300
Capitalization34.77M
GEORGIA CAPITAL
Price$25.52
Change+$1.00 (+4.08%)
Volume$250
Capitalization863.55M
ELLH vs GRGCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ELLH vs. GRGCF commentary
May 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ELLH is a Hold and GRGCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 24, 2025
Stock price -- (ELLH: $18.50 vs. GRGCF: $25.52)
Brand notoriety: ELLH and GRGCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ELLH: 36% vs. GRGCF: 27%
Market capitalization -- ELLH: $34.77M vs. GRGCF: $863.55M
ELLH [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $34.77M. GRGCF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $863.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ELLH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGRGCF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ELLH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GRGCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GRGCF is a better buy in the long-term than ELLH.

Price Growth

ELLH (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.16% price change this week, while GRGCF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +4.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

ELLH is expected to report earnings on Mar 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.97% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRGCF($864M) has a higher market cap than ELLH($34.8M). GRGCF YTD gains are higher at: 98.291 vs. ELLH (-6.032). GRGCF has higher revenues than ELLH: GRGCF (181M) vs ELLH (19K).
ELLHGRGCFELLH / GRGCF
Capitalization34.8M864M4%
EBITDA-2.73MN/A-
Gain YTD-6.03298.291-6%
P/E RatioN/A7.60-
Revenue19K181M0%
Total Cash10.8MN/A-
Total Debt0N/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ELLH vs GRGCF: Fundamental Ratings
ELLH
GRGCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8791
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10014
SMR RATING
1..100
9281
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6435
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
314
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GRGCF's Valuation (59) in the null industry is in the same range as ELLH (91). This means that GRGCF’s stock grew similarly to ELLH’s over the last 12 months.

GRGCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ELLH (100). This means that GRGCF’s stock grew significantly faster than ELLH’s over the last 12 months.

GRGCF's SMR Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as ELLH (92). This means that GRGCF’s stock grew similarly to ELLH’s over the last 12 months.

GRGCF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as ELLH (64). This means that GRGCF’s stock grew similarly to ELLH’s over the last 12 months.

GRGCF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as ELLH (31). This means that GRGCF’s stock grew similarly to ELLH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KXI66.37N/A
N/A
iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF
FID18.56N/A
N/A
First Trust S&P Int Div Aristocrats ETF
QTAP40.18N/A
N/A
Innovator Growth-100 Acltd Ps ETF™ April
DFAX28.23-0.02
-0.07%
Dimensional World ex US Core Eq 2 ETF
FCAL47.70-0.17
-0.36%
First Trust California Muni Hi Inc ETF

GRGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRGCF and FGCO have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRGCF and FGCO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRGCF
1D Price
Change %
GRGCF100%
N/A
FGCO - GRGCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ILXP - GRGCF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELLH - GRGCF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IHAI - GRGCF
-4%
Poorly correlated
+45.74%
DHCC - GRGCF
-7%
Poorly correlated
+31.13%
More