ELMA
Price
$21.40
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 2 closing price
PBFS
Price
$11.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
Ad is loading...

ELMA vs PBFS

Header iconELMA vs PBFS Comparison
Open Charts ELMA vs PBFSBanner chart's image
Elmer Ban
Price$21.40
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.42K
CapitalizationN/A
Pioneer Ban
Price$11.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$70.83K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
ELMA vs PBFS Comparison Chart
Loading...
PBFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
ELMA vs. PBFS commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ELMA is a Hold and PBFS is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (ELMA: $21.70 vs. PBFS: $11.12)
Brand notoriety: ELMA and PBFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ELMA: 50% vs. PBFS: 86%
Market capitalization -- ELMA: $15.05M vs. PBFS: $254.84M
ELMA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $15.05M. PBFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $254.84M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ELMA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePBFS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ELMA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PBFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ELMA is a better buy in the long-term than PBFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PBFS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PBFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

ELMA (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.35% price change this week, while PBFS (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

PBFS is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.91% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PBFS($255M) has a higher market cap than ELMA($15M). ELMA YTD gains are higher at: 15.589 vs. PBFS (9.890). PBFS has higher revenues than ELMA: PBFS (74.6M) vs ELMA (10.3M).
ELMAPBFSELMA / PBFS
Capitalization15M255M6%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD15.5899.890158%
P/E RatioN/A13.91-
Revenue10.3M74.6M14%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt675KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ELMA: Fundamental Ratings
ELMA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
45
SMR RATING
1..100
65
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
67
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PBFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PBFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME21.660.39
+1.83%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X67612.720000571.609400
+0.85%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA221.331.76
+0.80%
Tesla
SPY582.302.52
+0.43%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL231.78-2.07
-0.89%
Apple

ELMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ELMA and KFFB have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ELMA and KFFB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ELMA
1D Price
Change %
ELMA100%
+1.88%
KFFB - ELMA
24%
Poorly correlated
+4.76%
FRST - ELMA
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.82%
CFIC - ELMA
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PBFS - ELMA
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.17%
PLBC - ELMA
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.24%
More

PBFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PBFS has been loosely correlated with FMAO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PBFS jumps, then FMAO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBFS
1D Price
Change %
PBFS100%
-1.17%
FMAO - PBFS
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.68%
SMBK - PBFS
41%
Loosely correlated
+2.01%
WTBA - PBFS
39%
Loosely correlated
+3.85%
MCBS - PBFS
39%
Loosely correlated
+2.19%
RRBI - PBFS
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.37%
More