Ad is loading...
ELMGF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
RNDXF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 26 closing price
Ad is loading...

ELMGF vs RNDXF

Header iconELMGF vs RNDXF Comparison
Open Charts ELMGF vs RNDXFBanner chart's image
Element79 Gold
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$17.74K
CapitalizationN/A
Randgold & Exploration
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.33K
CapitalizationN/A
ELMGF vs RNDXF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ELMGF vs. RNDXF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ELMGF is a Hold and RNDXF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (ELMGF: $0.06 vs. RNDXF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: ELMGF and RNDXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ELMGF: 13% vs. RNDXF: 100%
Market capitalization -- ELMGF: $3.32M vs. RNDXF: $3.69M
ELMGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.32M. RNDXF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ELMGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRNDXF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ELMGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RNDXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ELMGF and RNDXF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

ELMGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -10.01% price change this week, while RNDXF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNDXF($3.69M) has a higher market cap than ELMGF($3.32M). RNDXF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. ELMGF (-54.445). ELMGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -6.27M vs. RNDXF (-21.31M). RNDXF has more cash in the bank: 106M vs. ELMGF (212K). ELMGF (0) and RNDXF (0) have equivalent revenues.
ELMGFRNDXFELMGF / RNDXF
Capitalization3.32M3.69M90%
EBITDA-6.27M-21.31M29%
Gain YTD-54.4450.000-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash212K106M0%
Total Debt4.48MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RNDXF: Fundamental Ratings
RNDXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
69
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
17
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NBHAX14.39-0.05
-0.35%
Neuberger Berman Equity Income A
GOODX51.94-0.18
-0.35%
GoodHaven
GBLFX38.18-0.22
-0.57%
American Funds Global Balanced F2
VELIX17.95-0.15
-0.83%
VELA Large Cap Plus I
CHCZX13.43-0.28
-2.04%
AB Discovery Growth Z

ELMGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ELMGF has been closely correlated with RNDXF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ELMGF jumps, then RNDXF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ELMGF
1D Price
Change %
ELMGF100%
+4.73%
RNDXF - ELMGF
70%
Closely correlated
N/A
AUHIF - ELMGF
66%
Loosely correlated
N/A
VMSSF - ELMGF
29%
Poorly correlated
+22.20%
XTGRF - ELMGF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.89%
AMEGF - ELMGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.86%
More

RNDXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RNDXF has been closely correlated with AUHIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 94% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RNDXF jumps, then AUHIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RNDXF
1D Price
Change %
RNDXF100%
N/A
AUHIF - RNDXF
94%
Closely correlated
N/A
ELMGF - RNDXF
70%
Closely correlated
+4.73%
XTGRF - RNDXF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.89%
AMEGF - RNDXF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.86%
ETFLF - RNDXF
25%
Poorly correlated
-24.83%
More