ELP vs KEP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ELP is a Hold and KEP is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ELP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKEP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- ELP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- KEP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ELP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KEP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ELP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- KEP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
ELP (@Electric Utilities) experienced а +1.09% price change this week, while KEP (@Electric Utilities) price change was -5.18% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was +1.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.54%.
Reported Earning Dates
ELP is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.
KEP is expected to report earnings on May 09, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electric Utilities (+1.29% weekly)Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.
| ELP | KEP | ELP / KEP | |
| Capitalization | 5.48B | 10.5B | 52% |
| EBITDA | 3.44B | -15.64T | -0% |
| Gain YTD | 25.295 | 6.250 | 405% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.95 | 12.56 | 103% |
| Revenue | 22.6B | 84.47T | 0% |
| Total Cash | 5.6B | 4.7T | 0% |
| Total Debt | 15.4B | 20.88T | 0% |
ELP | KEP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 64 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 57 Fair valued | 19 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 60 | 13 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KEP's Valuation (19) in the Electric Utilities industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ELP (57). This means that KEP’s stock grew somewhat faster than ELP’s over the last 12 months.
ELP's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Electric Utilities industry is significantly better than the same rating for KEP (100). This means that ELP’s stock grew significantly faster than KEP’s over the last 12 months.
KEP's SMR Rating (13) in the Electric Utilities industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ELP (60). This means that KEP’s stock grew somewhat faster than ELP’s over the last 12 months.
ELP's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as KEP (52). This means that ELP’s stock grew similarly to KEP’s over the last 12 months.
ELP's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the Electric Utilities industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KEP (99). This means that ELP’s stock grew somewhat faster than KEP’s over the last 12 months.
| ELP | KEP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 68% | 9 days ago 55% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 46% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BCHG | 2.60 | 0.24 | +10.32% |
| Grayscale Bitcoin Cash Trust (BCH) | |||
| MGOV | 20.33 | 0.07 | +0.36% |
| First Trust Intermediate Gvt Opps ETF | |||
| IHDG | 43.49 | 0.09 | +0.21% |
| WisdomTree Intl Hdgd Qual Div Gr ETF | |||
| FEBZ | 33.40 | 0.04 | +0.11% |
| TrueShares Structured OutcomeFebruaryETF | |||
| BGB | 12.05 | -0.03 | -0.25% |
| Blackstone Strategic Credit 2027 Term Fund | |||
ELP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ELP has been closely correlated with ELPC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ELP jumps, then ELPC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ELP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELP | 100% | +1.64% | ||
| ELPC - ELP | 79% Closely correlated | +2.82% | ||
| EBR - ELP | 74% Closely correlated | +1.13% | ||
| CIG - ELP | 66% Closely correlated | -2.27% | ||
| DUK - ELP | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.74% | ||
| SSEZY - ELP | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.67% | ||
More | ||||
KEP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KEP has been loosely correlated with ENIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KEP jumps, then ENIC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KEP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KEP | 100% | -0.14% | ||
| ENIC - KEP | 35% Loosely correlated | -2.62% | ||
| BKH - KEP | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.59% | ||
| BIP - KEP | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.23% | ||
| ELP - KEP | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.27% | ||
| EONGY - KEP | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.07% | ||
More | ||||