ELRRF
Price
$0.61
Change
+$0.01 (+1.67%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
HL
Price
$5.00
Change
-$0.33 (-6.19%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
55 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ELRRF vs HL

Header iconELRRF vs HL Comparison
Open Charts ELRRF vs HLBanner chart's image
Eloro Resources
Price$0.61
Change+$0.01 (+1.67%)
Volume$65.4K
CapitalizationN/A
Hecla Mining
Price$5.00
Change-$0.33 (-6.19%)
Volume$88.37K
CapitalizationN/A
ELRRF vs HL Comparison Chart
Loading...
ELRRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ELRRF vs. HL commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ELRRF is a StrongBuy and HL is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (ELRRF: $0.61 vs. HL: $5.33)
Brand notoriety: ELRRF: Not notable vs. HL: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ELRRF: 206% vs. HL: 99%
Market capitalization -- ELRRF: $176.11M vs. HL: $3.01B
ELRRF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $176.11M. HL’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ELRRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ELRRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HL is a better buy in the long-term than ELRRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ELRRF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ELRRF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • HL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HL is a better buy in the short-term than ELRRF.

Price Growth

ELRRF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -13.28% price change this week, while HL (@Precious Metals) price change was -6.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -3.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.67%.

Reported Earning Dates

HL is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-3.69% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HL($3.01B) has a higher market cap than ELRRF($176M). HL YTD gains are higher at: 11.618 vs. ELRRF (-62.501). HL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 124M vs. ELRRF (-11.47M). HL has more cash in the bank: 106M vs. ELRRF (2.74M). ELRRF has less debt than HL: ELRRF (187K) vs HL (663M). HL has higher revenues than ELRRF: HL (720M) vs ELRRF (0).
ELRRFHLELRRF / HL
Capitalization176M3.01B6%
EBITDA-11.47M124M-9%
Gain YTD-62.50111.618-538%
P/E RatioN/A1111.11-
Revenue0720M-
Total Cash2.74M106M3%
Total Debt187K663M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ELRRF vs HL: Fundamental Ratings
ELRRF
HL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
639
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8454
SMR RATING
1..100
9489
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6461
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1001
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ELRRF's Valuation (64) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HL (97) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that ELRRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HL’s over the last 12 months.

HL's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as ELRRF (84) in the null industry. This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to ELRRF’s over the last 12 months.

HL's SMR Rating (89) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as ELRRF (94) in the null industry. This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to ELRRF’s over the last 12 months.

HL's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as ELRRF (64) in the null industry. This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to ELRRF’s over the last 12 months.

HL's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for ELRRF (100) in the null industry. This means that HL’s stock grew significantly faster than ELRRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ELRRFHL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ELRRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPEGX18.78N/A
N/A
Alger Responsible Investing A
GSYPX43.22N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value P
RIDFX24.78-0.13
-0.52%
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R5
IFUTX26.11-0.15
-0.57%
Invesco Dividend Income R6
PEMZX13.19-0.10
-0.75%
Putnam Emerging Markets Equity C

ELRRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ELRRF has been loosely correlated with AG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ELRRF jumps, then AG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ELRRF
1D Price
Change %
ELRRF100%
+2.74%
AG - ELRRF
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.84%
CDE - ELRRF
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
HL - ELRRF
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
WPM - ELRRF
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.43%
TFPM - ELRRF
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
More