ELVG
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 30 closing price
SOMLF
Price
$29.25
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Ad is loading...

ELVG vs SOMLF

Header iconELVG vs SOMLF Comparison
Open Charts ELVG vs SOMLFBanner chart's image
Elvictor Group
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10K
CapitalizationN/A
Secom
Price$29.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.42K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
ELVG vs SOMLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
VS
ELVG vs. SOMLF commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ELVG is a Hold and SOMLF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (ELVG: $0.03 vs. SOMLF: $34.22)
Brand notoriety: ELVG and SOMLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ELVG: 457% vs. SOMLF: 73%
Market capitalization -- ELVG: $8.29M vs. SOMLF: $14.43B
ELVG [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $8.29M. SOMLF’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $14.43B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ELVG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSOMLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ELVG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SOMLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ELVG and SOMLF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

ELVG (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а -16.39% price change this week, while SOMLF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +1.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.84%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+1.29% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SOMLF($14.4B) has a higher market cap than ELVG($8.29M). SOMLF has higher P/E ratio than ELVG: SOMLF (20.37) vs ELVG (1.61). ELVG YTD gains are higher at: 177.778 vs. SOMLF (-1.856). SOMLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 165B vs. ELVG (-246.16K). SOMLF has more cash in the bank: 678B vs. ELVG (460K). ELVG has less debt than SOMLF: ELVG (307K) vs SOMLF (62.9B). SOMLF has higher revenues than ELVG: SOMLF (1.08T) vs ELVG (2.52M).
ELVGSOMLFELVG / SOMLF
Capitalization8.29M14.4B0%
EBITDA-246.16K165B-0%
Gain YTD177.778-1.856-9,581%
P/E Ratio1.6120.378%
Revenue2.52M1.08T0%
Total Cash460K678B0%
Total Debt307K62.9B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SOMLF: Fundamental Ratings
SOMLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
74
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
97
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

ELVG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ELVG has been loosely correlated with DNPCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ELVG jumps, then DNPCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ELVG
1D Price
Change %
ELVG100%
+25.00%
DNPCF - ELVG
56%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CIX - ELVG
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
SOMLF - ELVG
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BVVBY - ELVG
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
LZ - ELVG
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
More

SOMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SOMLF and DRMKY have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SOMLF and DRMKY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SOMLF
1D Price
Change %
SOMLF100%
N/A
DRMKY - SOMLF
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.04%
DNPCF - SOMLF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELVG - SOMLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+25.00%
SOMLY - SOMLF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGSOY - SOMLF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.27%
More