Ad is loading...
EMAUF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
GIDMF
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.04 (-19.05%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

EMAUF vs GIDMF

Header iconEMAUF vs GIDMF Comparison
Open Charts EMAUF vs GIDMFBanner chart's image
EMPEROR METALS
Price$0.05
Change-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Volume$20K
CapitalizationN/A
Nexus Uranium
Price$0.17
Change-$0.04 (-19.05%)
Volume$1.73K
CapitalizationN/A
EMAUF vs GIDMF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMAUF vs. GIDMF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMAUF is a Hold and GIDMF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (EMAUF: $0.05 vs. GIDMF: $0.17)
Brand notoriety: EMAUF and GIDMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMAUF: 22% vs. GIDMF: 58%
Market capitalization -- EMAUF: $3.24M vs. GIDMF: $17.28M
EMAUF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.24M. GIDMF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $17.28M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMAUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGIDMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EMAUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GIDMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both EMAUF and GIDMF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

EMAUF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -4.59% price change this week, while GIDMF (@Precious Metals) price change was -8.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -2.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.75%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-2.07% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GIDMF($17.3M) has a higher market cap than EMAUF($3.24M). EMAUF YTD gains are higher at: -22.857 vs. GIDMF (-63.037). GIDMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -284.38K vs. EMAUF (-1.06M). EMAUF has more cash in the bank: 2.37M vs. GIDMF (839K). EMAUF (0) and GIDMF (0) have equivalent revenues.
EMAUFGIDMFEMAUF / GIDMF
Capitalization3.24M17.3M19%
EBITDA-1.06M-284.38K374%
Gain YTD-22.857-63.03736%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash2.37M839K283%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BITO24.661.08
+4.58%
ProShares Bitcoin ETF
BSJO22.700.01
+0.04%
Invesco BulletShares 2024 HY Corp Bd ETF
GAST27.81N/A
N/A
Gabelli Automation ETF
GHYB44.94-0.01
-0.02%
Goldman Sachs Access Hi Yld Corp Bd ETF
PLTM9.09-0.01
-0.10%
GraniteShares Platinum Trust

EMAUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMAUF and NESRF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMAUF and NESRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMAUF
1D Price
Change %
EMAUF100%
-6.90%
NESRF - EMAUF
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.09%
CYNXF - EMAUF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NPTLF - EMAUF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QDROF - EMAUF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DNRSF - EMAUF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GIDMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GIDMF and OCANF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GIDMF and OCANF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GIDMF
1D Price
Change %
GIDMF100%
-17.31%
OCANF - GIDMF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.54%
MCDMF - GIDMF
22%
Poorly correlated
-14.55%
SXNTF - GIDMF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WRLGF - GIDMF
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.25%
EMAUF - GIDMF
3%
Poorly correlated
-6.90%
More