Ad is loading...
EMFIX vs RNWFX
EMFIX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts EMFIX vs RNWFX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Instl
Price$10.35
Change-$0.19 (-1.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets157.94M
American Funds New World R5
Price$75.72
Change-$0.84 (-1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets60.23B
EMFIX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMFIX vs. RNWFX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMFIX is a StrongBuy and RNWFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 60.2B vs. EMFIX (158M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than EMFIX: RNWFX (1.17) vs EMFIX (0.60). EMFIX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: EMFIX (14 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). EMFIX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). EMFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMFIX: RNWFX (250) vs EMFIX (1000000). EMFIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.77 vs. RNWFX (-0.07). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 32.74 vs. EMFIX (17.90).
| EMFIX | RNWFX | EMFIX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.62 | 165% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.62 | 224% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.771 | -1.993 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158M | 60.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.17 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.77 | -0.07 | -7,003% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.90 | 4.10 | 168% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.90 | 32.74 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.39 | 38.44 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...