Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMGNX vs RNWHX
EMGNX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts EMGNX vs RNWHX
Allspring Emerging Markets Equity Inst
Price$30.66
Change+$0.23 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.62B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$87.45
Change+$0.90 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.99B
EMGNX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMGNX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMGNX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 69B vs. EMGNX (3.62B). EMGNX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: EMGNX (1.21) vs RNWHX (1.04). EMGNX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EMGNX (15 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). EMGNX (1.20) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. EMGNX (10.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMGNX: RNWHX (250) vs EMGNX (1000000). EMGNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.25 vs. RNWHX (11.19). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 35.11 vs. EMGNX (20.10).
| EMGNX | RNWHX | EMGNX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.72 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.72 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.581 | 15.036 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.62B | 69B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 1.04 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.25 | 11.19 | 154% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.31 | 35.35 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.10 | 35.11 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.11 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement