EMHLF
Price
$0.14
Change
+$0.04 (+40.00%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
121.16M
YLLXF
Price
$6.85
Change
+$0.09 (+1.33%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.1B
Interact to see
Advertisement

EMHLF vs YLLXF

Header iconEMHLF vs YLLXF Comparison
Open Charts EMHLF vs YLLXFBanner chart's image
European Metals Holdings
Price$0.14
Change+$0.04 (+40.00%)
Volume$2.75K
Capitalization121.16M
Yellow Cake
Price$6.85
Change+$0.09 (+1.33%)
Volume$7.79K
Capitalization1.1B
EMHLF vs YLLXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EMHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YLLXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMHLF vs. YLLXF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMHLF is a Hold and YLLXF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (EMHLF: $0.09 vs. YLLXF: $6.85)
Brand notoriety: EMHLF and YLLXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMHLF: 8% vs. YLLXF: 126%
Market capitalization -- EMHLF: $121.16M vs. YLLXF: $1.1B
EMHLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $121.16M. YLLXF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $1.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMHLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileYLLXF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EMHLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • YLLXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, YLLXF is a better buy in the long-term than EMHLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMHLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YLLXF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EMHLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • YLLXF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EMHLF is a better buy in the short-term than YLLXF.

Price Growth

EMHLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -17.00% price change this week, while YLLXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +4.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.73%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
YLLXF($1.1B) has a higher market cap than EMHLF($121M). EMHLF has higher P/E ratio than YLLXF: EMHLF (28.82) vs YLLXF (8.22). YLLXF YTD gains are higher at: 9.600 vs. EMHLF (5.671). EMHLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -7.27M vs. YLLXF (-12.64M). EMHLF has more cash in the bank: 17.5M vs. YLLXF (14.4M). EMHLF has higher revenues than YLLXF: EMHLF (1.1M) vs YLLXF (-6.07M).
EMHLFYLLXFEMHLF / YLLXF
Capitalization121M1.1B11%
EBITDA-7.27M-12.64M58%
Gain YTD5.6719.60059%
P/E Ratio28.828.22350%
Revenue1.1M-6.07M-18%
Total Cash17.5M14.4M122%
Total Debt64KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
YLLXF: Fundamental Ratings
YLLXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
84
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
46
SMR RATING
1..100
62
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMHLFYLLXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EMHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YLLXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CAREX16.550.12
+0.73%
Domini Sustainable Solutions Inv
PLGAX16.330.06
+0.37%
Principal LargeCap Growth I A
MAPTX20.44-0.02
-0.10%
Matthews Pacific Tiger Investor
PVCIX12.48-0.02
-0.16%
Palm Valley Capital Institutional
RDWEX12.61-0.09
-0.71%
American Funds Dvlpg Wld Gr&Inc R4

EMHLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMHLF and BTRYF have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMHLF and BTRYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMHLF
1D Price
Change %
EMHLF100%
N/A
BTRYF - EMHLF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YLLXF - EMHLF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.33%
SMRVF - EMHLF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MP - EMHLF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
ASMMF - EMHLF
2%
Poorly correlated
-7.52%
More

YLLXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YLLXF has been loosely correlated with ISOU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YLLXF jumps, then ISOU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YLLXF
1D Price
Change %
YLLXF100%
+1.33%
ISOU - YLLXF
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.71%
UROY - YLLXF
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.64%
DNN - YLLXF
39%
Loosely correlated
-2.20%
UEC - YLLXF
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.60%
DYLLF - YLLXF
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
More