Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
EMLP vs GPOW
EMLP vs GPOW Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMLP vs. GPOW commentary
Nov 17, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMLP is a Buy and GPOW is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMLP has more net assets: 2.97B vs. GPOW (10.9M). EMLP has a higher annual dividend yield than GPOW: EMLP (33.982) vs GPOW (31.812). EMLP was incepted earlier than GPOW: EMLP (12 years) vs GPOW (1 year).
| EMLP | GPOW | EMLP / GPOW | |
| Gain YTD | 33.982 | 31.812 | 107% |
| Net Assets | 2.97B | 10.9M | 27,202% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 32.00 | N/A | - |
| Yield | 3.66 | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 1 year | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EMLP | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GICCX | 12.46 | -0.04 | -0.32% |
| Goldman Sachs Intl Sm Cp Insghts C | |||
| LMVOX | 32.68 | -0.27 | -0.82% |
| Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value F3 | |||
| LSCNX | 25.63 | -0.30 | -1.16% |
| Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value N | |||
| SLGFX | 20.50 | -0.27 | -1.30% |
| SEI Large Cap Index F (SIMT) | |||
| AICFX | 61.21 | -0.83 | -1.34% |
| American Funds Invmt Co of Amer F1 | |||
EMLP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMLP has been closely correlated with KMI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EMLP jumps, then KMI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMLP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMLP | 100% | +1.21% | ||
| KMI - EMLP | 79% Closely correlated | +1.91% | ||
| OKE - EMLP | 75% Closely correlated | +1.79% | ||
| WMB - EMLP | 73% Closely correlated | +1.75% | ||
| BKH - EMLP | 73% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| LNT - EMLP | 72% Closely correlated | +2.49% | ||
More | ||||
GPOW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GPOW has been closely correlated with WMB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GPOW jumps, then WMB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GPOW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPOW | 100% | +0.82% | ||
| WMB - GPOW | 80% Closely correlated | +1.75% | ||
| KMI - GPOW | 80% Closely correlated | +1.91% | ||
| OKE - GPOW | 77% Closely correlated | +1.79% | ||
| AM - GPOW | 74% Closely correlated | +1.06% | ||
| ET - GPOW | 71% Closely correlated | +0.82% | ||
More | ||||