EMPYF
Price
$0.30
Change
+$0.01 (+3.33%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
MFGCF
Price
$1.40
Change
-$0.07 (-4.76%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

EMPYF vs MFGCF

Header iconEMPYF vs MFGCF Comparison
Open Charts EMPYF vs MFGCFBanner chart's image
Empress Royalty
Price$0.30
Change+$0.01 (+3.33%)
Volume$111.98K
CapitalizationN/A
Mayfair Gold
Price$1.40
Change-$0.07 (-4.76%)
Volume$3.6K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
EMPYF vs MFGCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
EMPYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
EMPYF vs. MFGCF commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMPYF is a StrongBuy and MFGCF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (EMPYF: $0.31 vs. MFGCF: $1.40)
Brand notoriety: EMPYF and MFGCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMPYF: 71% vs. MFGCF: 44%
Market capitalization -- EMPYF: $27.64M vs. MFGCF: $152.1M
EMPYF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $27.64M. MFGCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $152.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMPYF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMFGCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EMPYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MFGCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EMPYF is a better buy in the long-term than MFGCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMPYF’s TA Score shows that 8 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • EMPYF’s TA Score: 8 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

EMPYF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +1.67% price change this week, while MFGCF (@Precious Metals) price change was -2.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.61%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.12% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFGCF($152M) has a higher market cap than EMPYF($27.6M). EMPYF YTD gains are higher at: 34.007 vs. MFGCF (-27.273). MFGCF has more cash in the bank: 5.56M vs. EMPYF (783K). MFGCF has less debt than EMPYF: MFGCF (0) vs EMPYF (2.98M).
EMPYFMFGCFEMPYF / MFGCF
Capitalization27.6M152M18%
EBITDAN/A-21.02M-
Gain YTD34.007-27.273-125%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total Cash783K5.56M14%
Total Debt2.98M0-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMPYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EMPYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

EMPYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMPYF and STLRF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMPYF and STLRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMPYF
1D Price
Change %
EMPYF100%
+5.32%
STLRF - EMPYF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.91%
ELEMF - EMPYF
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.14%
GROY - EMPYF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTA - EMPYF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%
PAAS - EMPYF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.32%
More

MFGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MFGCF and TGLDF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MFGCF and TGLDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFGCF
1D Price
Change %
MFGCF100%
N/A
TGLDF - MFGCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IAUX - MFGCF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
EMPYF - MFGCF
4%
Poorly correlated
+5.32%
ANPMF - MFGCF
2%
Poorly correlated
-3.12%
OGGNF - MFGCF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More