EMPYF
Price
$0.50
Change
+$0.01 (+2.04%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
27.64M
PDLMF
Price
$0.34
Change
-$0.03 (-8.11%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
181.21M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EMPYF vs PDLMF

Header iconEMPYF vs PDLMF Comparison
Open Charts EMPYF vs PDLMFBanner chart's image
Empress Royalty
Price$0.50
Change+$0.01 (+2.04%)
Volume$386.09K
Capitalization27.64M
Petra Diamonds
Price$0.34
Change-$0.03 (-8.11%)
Volume$12K
Capitalization181.21M
EMPYF vs PDLMF Comparison Chart
Loading...
EMPYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMPYF vs. PDLMF commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMPYF is a Hold and PDLMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (EMPYF: $0.50 vs. PDLMF: $0.34)
Brand notoriety: EMPYF and PDLMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMPYF: 121% vs. PDLMF: 225%
Market capitalization -- EMPYF: $27.64M vs. PDLMF: $181.21M
EMPYF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $27.64M. PDLMF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $181.21M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMPYF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePDLMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EMPYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PDLMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EMPYF is a better buy in the long-term than PDLMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMPYF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • EMPYF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

EMPYF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +10.03% price change this week, while PDLMF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +7.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.90%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+7.34% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDLMF($181M) has a higher market cap than EMPYF($27.6M). EMPYF YTD gains are higher at: 102.316 vs. PDLMF (-13.535). PDLMF has more cash in the bank: 130M vs. EMPYF (783K). EMPYF has less debt than PDLMF: EMPYF (2.98M) vs PDLMF (262M).
EMPYFPDLMFEMPYF / PDLMF
Capitalization27.6M181M15%
EBITDAN/A194M-
Gain YTD102.316-13.535-756%
P/E RatioN/A89.29-
RevenueN/A533M-
Total Cash783K130M1%
Total Debt2.98M262M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PDLMF: Fundamental Ratings
PDLMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
32
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
78
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMPYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EMPYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRTX1.800.02
+1.40%
BioRestorative Therapies
CHMG46.670.52
+1.13%
Chemung Financial Corp
SMPL33.17-0.17
-0.51%
Simply Good Foods Company (The)
STX126.97-0.73
-0.57%
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC
AORT28.95-0.17
-0.58%
Artivion

EMPYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMPYF and ELEMF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMPYF and ELEMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMPYF
1D Price
Change %
EMPYF100%
+1.45%
ELEMF - EMPYF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
GROY - EMPYF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
PAAS - EMPYF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.17%
MTA - EMPYF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
AU - EMPYF
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.40%
More

PDLMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PDLMF has been loosely correlated with PAEKY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PDLMF jumps, then PAEKY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PDLMF
1D Price
Change %
PDLMF100%
N/A
PAEKY - PDLMF
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GSISF - PDLMF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STRFF - PDLMF
11%
Poorly correlated
+4.67%
KLGDF - PDLMF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMPYF - PDLMF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.45%
More