Ad is loading...
EMQAX vs RNWHX
EMQAX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts EMQAX vs RNWHX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Active Eq A
Price$7.69
Change+$0.07 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.37M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$74.96
Change+$0.47 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets59.57B
EMQAX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMQAX vs. RNWHX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMQAX is a StrongBuy and RNWHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 59.6B vs. EMQAX (21.4M). EMQAX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: EMQAX (2.29) vs RNWHX (1.12). EMQAX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EMQAX (8 years) vs RNWHX (9 years). EMQAX (1.69) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). EMQAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 237.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMQAX: RNWHX (250) vs EMQAX (1000). EMQAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.22 vs. RNWHX (0.63). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 32.89 vs. EMQAX (-10.34).
| EMQAX | RNWHX | EMQAX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.72 | 176% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.72 | 235% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.522 | -1.394 | 37% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.4M | 59.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.29 | 1.12 | 204% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.22 | 0.63 | 1,769% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.75 | 4.75 | -16% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.34 | 32.89 | -31% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...