Ad is loading...
EMQCX vs RNWFX
EMQCX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts EMQCX vs RNWFX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Active Eq C
Price$7.70
Change+$0.07 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.08M
American Funds New World R5
Price$79.31
Change+$0.25 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.36B
EMQCX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMQCX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jan 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMQCX is a Hold and RNWFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 63.4B vs. EMQCX (22.1M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than EMQCX: RNWFX (1.51) vs EMQCX (1.05). EMQCX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: EMQCX (8 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). EMQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 189.00 vs. RNWFX (32.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMQCX: RNWFX (250) vs EMQCX (1000). EMQCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.54 vs. RNWFX (8.40). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.02 vs. EMQCX (-28.88).
| EMQCX | RNWFX | EMQCX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.692 | 2.653 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.1M | 63.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 1.51 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.54 | 8.40 | 221% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.81 | 0.55 | -2,135% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.88 | 15.02 | -192% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 50.52 | - |