Ad is loading...
EMQCX vs RNWFX
EMQCX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts EMQCX vs RNWFX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Active Eq C
Price$7.55
Change+$0.03 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds New World R5
Price$77.72
Change+$0.12 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
EMQCX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMQCX vs. RNWFX commentary
Dec 24, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMQCX is a Buy and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 62.2B vs. EMQCX (21.8M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than EMQCX: RNWFX (1.51) vs EMQCX (1.05). EMQCX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: EMQCX (8 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). EMQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 189.00 vs. RNWFX (32.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMQCX: RNWFX (250) vs EMQCX (1000). EMQCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.82 vs. RNWFX (5.86). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 14.39 vs. EMQCX (-29.38).
| EMQCX | RNWFX | EMQCX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.871 | 4.549 | 239% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.8M | 62.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 1.51 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.82 | 5.86 | 219% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.95 | -5.10 | 234% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.38 | 14.39 | -204% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 42.67 | - |