Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMQCX vs RNWFX
EMQCX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts EMQCX vs RNWFX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Active Eq C
Price$8.71
Change+$0.04 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.49M
American Funds New World R5
Price$89.84
Change+$0.23 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.13B
EMQCX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMQCX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMQCX is a Buy and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 70.1B vs. EMQCX (12.5M). EMQCX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: EMQCX (1.79) vs RNWFX (1.04). EMQCX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: EMQCX (9 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). EMQCX (3.02) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). EMQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 237.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMQCX: RNWFX (250) vs EMQCX (1000). EMQCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.46 vs. RNWFX (11.55). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 29.89 vs. EMQCX (-12.01).
| EMQCX | RNWFX | EMQCX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 0.62 | 331% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.02 | 0.62 | 487% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.987 | 16.283 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.5M | 70.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 1.04 | 173% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.46 | 11.55 | 177% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.90 | 41.57 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.01 | 29.89 | -40% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 68.59 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement