Ad is loading...
EMQCX vs RNWHX
EMQCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts EMQCX vs RNWHX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Active Eq C
Price$7.60
Change-$0.15 (-1.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.47M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$76.05
Change-$1.84 (-2.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.34B
EMQCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMQCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMQCX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 62.3B vs. EMQCX (22.5M). EMQCX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: EMQCX (1.91) vs RNWHX (1.12). EMQCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EMQCX (8 years) vs RNWHX (9 years). EMQCX (2.79) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). EMQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 237.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMQCX: RNWHX (250) vs EMQCX (1000). EMQCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.40 vs. RNWHX (-1.62). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 50.02 vs. EMQCX (-0.71).
| EMQCX | RNWHX | EMQCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.02 | 0.72 | 281% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.79 | 0.72 | 388% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.307 | 0.039 | 10,911% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.5M | 62.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.91 | 1.12 | 170% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.40 | -1.62 | -702% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.11 | 0.02 | -20,590% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.71 | 50.02 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...