Ad is loading...
EMQCX vs RNWHX
EMQCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts EMQCX vs RNWHX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Active Eq C
Price$7.55
Change+$0.03 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds New World R5E
Price$76.47
Change+$0.12 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
EMQCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMQCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Dec 24, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMQCX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 62.2B vs. EMQCX (21.8M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than EMQCX: RNWHX (1.44) vs EMQCX (1.05). EMQCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EMQCX (8 years) vs RNWHX (9 years). EMQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 189.00 vs. RNWHX (32.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMQCX: RNWHX (250) vs EMQCX (1000). EMQCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.82 vs. RNWHX (5.71). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 13.80 vs. EMQCX (-29.38).
| EMQCX | RNWHX | EMQCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.871 | 4.394 | 247% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.8M | 62.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 1.44 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.82 | 5.71 | 225% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.95 | -5.37 | 222% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.38 | 13.80 | -213% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...