EMTRF vs ZZZOF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMTRF is a Sell and ZZZOF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EMTRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZZZOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- EMTRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- ZZZOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EMTRF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZZZOF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EMTRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
- ZZZOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
EMTRF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +11.94% price change this week, while ZZZOF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -3.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.20%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Metals/Minerals (-3.39% weekly)The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
| EMTRF | ZZZOF | EMTRF / ZZZOF | |
| Capitalization | 11.2M | 307K | 3,648% |
| EBITDA | -2.68M | -24.73K | 10,859% |
| Gain YTD | 129.801 | -13.853 | -937% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 0 | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 645K | 156K | 413% |
| Total Debt | 40K | 390K | 10% |
ZZZOF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 94 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 21 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 23 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| EMTRF | ZZZOF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 43% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 43% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 56% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CTHCX | 75.92 | -0.59 | -0.77% |
| Columbia Global Technology Growth C | |||
| CFNCX | 90.05 | -0.75 | -0.83% |
| American Funds Fundamental Invs 529C | |||
| RMQCX | 504.20 | -4.24 | -0.83% |
| Rydex Monthly Rbl NASDAQ-100® 2x Strt C | |||
| WWSYX | 21.31 | -0.32 | -1.48% |
| Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund Ultra | |||
| USBNX | 28.15 | -1.17 | -4.00% |
| Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Ord | |||
EMTRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EMTRF and CBBLF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMTRF and CBBLF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMTRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMTRF | 100% | -2.10% | ||
| CBBLF - EMTRF | 28% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GTCDF - EMTRF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ZZZOF - EMTRF | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ANSNF - EMTRF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NSRCF - EMTRF | 5% Poorly correlated | +2.09% | ||
More | ||||
ZZZOF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZZZOF has been loosely correlated with ANLBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZZZOF jumps, then ANLBF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ZZZOF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZZZOF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ANLBF - ZZZOF | 44% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ASHXF - ZZZOF | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| EMGDF - ZZZOF | 23% Poorly correlated | -2.43% | ||
| AVPMF - ZZZOF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GPHOF - ZZZOF | 20% Poorly correlated | -2.81% | ||
More | ||||