Ad is loading...
EMXC vs OAEM
EMXC vs OAEM Comparison
Open Charts EMXC vs OAEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Mkts ex China ETF
Price$55.56
Change+$0.17 (+0.31%)
Volume$14.21K
Net Assets14.52B
OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF
Price$29.00
Change+$0.02 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.44M
EMXC vs OAEM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMXC vs. OAEM commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMXC is a Hold and OAEM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMXC has more net assets: 14.5B vs. OAEM (43.4M). EMXC has a higher annual dividend yield than OAEM: EMXC (-0.108) vs OAEM (-0.547). EMXC was incepted earlier than OAEM: EMXC (8 years) vs OAEM (3 years). EMXC (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than OAEM (1.25). OAEM has a higher turnover EMXC (12.00) vs EMXC (12.00).
| EMXC | OAEM | EMXC / OAEM | |
| Gain YTD | -0.108 | -0.547 | 20% |
| Net Assets | 14.5B | 43.4M | 33,410% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 1.25 | 20% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 35.00 | 34% |
| Yield | 2.70 | 0.93 | 289% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EMXC | OAEM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 81% | 9 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 7 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EMXC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMXC has been loosely correlated with TEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EMXC jumps, then TEL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMXC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMXC | 100% | +0.54% | ||
| TEL - EMXC | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| OUT - EMXC | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| SCCO - EMXC | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.45% | ||
| ARI - EMXC | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| CLS - EMXC | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.32% | ||
More | ||||
OAEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OAEM has been loosely correlated with WIT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OAEM jumps, then WIT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OAEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OAEM | 100% | +0.92% | ||
| WIT - OAEM | 37% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| MMYT - OAEM | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.16% | ||
| INFY - OAEM | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| NU - OAEM | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.86% | ||
| HDB - OAEM | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.79% | ||
More | ||||