Loading...
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ENSG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLFST’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ENSG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LFST’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
ENSG (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -0.63% price change this week, while LFST (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was +6.01% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.77%.
ENSG is expected to report earnings on Jul 25, 2024.
LFST is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2024.
The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
ENSG | LFST | ENSG / LFST | |
Capitalization | 7.05B | 2.36B | 299% |
EBITDA | 353M | -104.93M | -336% |
Gain YTD | 3.918 | -16.603 | -24% |
P/E Ratio | 33.94 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 3.73B | 1.06B | 353% |
Total Cash | 527M | 78.8M | 669% |
Total Debt | 1.87B | 508M | 368% |
ENSG | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 29 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 2 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ENSG | LFST | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago83% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago55% | 1 day ago86% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago69% | 1 day ago76% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | 1 day ago84% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | 1 day ago80% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | 1 day ago79% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago73% | 1 day ago81% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago61% | 18 days ago88% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago79% | 1 day ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago69% | 1 day ago90% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
UEVM | 47.51 | 0.85 | +1.82% |
VictoryShares Emerging Mkts Val MomtETF | |||
PFM | 40.99 | 0.21 | +0.51% |
Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF | |||
TLH | 99.89 | 0.51 | +0.51% |
iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF | |||
MFUL | 21.02 | 0.04 | +0.19% |
Mindful Conservative ETF | |||
FSBD | 45.57 | 0.08 | +0.18% |
Fidelity Sustainable Core Plus Bond ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ENSG has been loosely correlated with PNTG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ENSG jumps, then PNTG could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ENSG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ENSG | 100% | -2.43% | ||
PNTG - ENSG | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.28% | ||
SGRY - ENSG | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.50% | ||
UHS - ENSG | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.18% | ||
ASTH - ENSG | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.48% | ||
EHC - ENSG | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.65% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LFST has been loosely correlated with ENSG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LFST jumps, then ENSG could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LFST | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LFST | 100% | +1.24% | ||
ENSG - LFST | 36% Loosely correlated | -2.43% | ||
ASTH - LFST | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.48% | ||
SGRY - LFST | 33% Loosely correlated | +1.50% | ||
ADUS - LFST | 33% Loosely correlated | +0.01% | ||
CHE - LFST | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.14% | ||
More |