Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ENYIX vs PBFCX
ENYIX vs PBFCX Comparison
Open Charts ENYIX vs PBFCX
Eaton Vance NY Municipal Opps I
Price$9.20
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.16M
PIMCO NY Municipal C
Price$10.47
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets875.98M
ENYIX vs PBFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ENYIX vs. PBFCX commentary
May 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ENYIX is a Hold and PBFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PBFCX has more cash in the bank: 876M vs. ENYIX (65.2M). ENYIX pays higher dividends than PBFCX: ENYIX (3.42) vs PBFCX (2.55). ENYIX was incepted earlier than PBFCX: ENYIX (15 years) vs PBFCX (16 years). PBFCX (1.52) is less costly to investors than ENYIX (0.67). ENYIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. PBFCX (18.00). PBFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ENYIX: PBFCX (1000) vs ENYIX (1000000). ENYIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.77 vs. PBFCX (-0.51). ENYIX return over 5 years is better than : 2.02 vs. PBFCX (-0.87).
| ENYIX | PBFCX | ENYIX / PBFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 1.52 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.52 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.638 | -2.002 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 65.2M | 876M | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.42 | 2.55 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.77 | -0.51 | -151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.01 | 5.84 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.02 | -0.87 | -231% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.85 | 9.79 | 39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement