Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ENYIX vs PBFCX
ENYIX vs PBFCX Comparison
Open Charts ENYIX vs PBFCX
Eaton Vance NY Municipal Opps I
Price$9.17
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.97M
PIMCO NY Municipal C
Price$10.41
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets876.31M
ENYIX vs PBFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ENYIX vs. PBFCX commentary
Jun 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ENYIX is a Hold and PBFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PBFCX has more cash in the bank: 876M vs. ENYIX (67M). ENYIX pays higher dividends than PBFCX: ENYIX (3.47) vs PBFCX (2.56). ENYIX was incepted earlier than PBFCX: ENYIX (15 years) vs PBFCX (16 years). PBFCX (1.52) is less costly to investors than ENYIX (0.67). ENYIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 138.00 vs. PBFCX (18.00). PBFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ENYIX: PBFCX (1000) vs ENYIX (1000000). ENYIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.38 vs. PBFCX (-1.74). ENYIX return over 5 years is better than : 0.14 vs. PBFCX (-3.01).
| ENYIX | PBFCX | ENYIX / PBFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 1.52 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.52 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.780 | -2.445 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 67M | 876M | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.47 | 2.56 | 135% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.38 | -1.74 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.09 | 5.45 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.14 | -3.01 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.80 | 9.20 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement