EOGSF
Price
$2.73
Change
+$0.04 (+1.49%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.2B
PGLDF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
16M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EOGSF vs PGLDF

Header iconEOGSF vs PGLDF Comparison
Open Charts EOGSF vs PGLDFBanner chart's image
Emerald Oil & Gas NL
Price$2.73
Change+$0.04 (+1.49%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization1.2B
P2 Gold
Price$0.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$30.5K
Capitalization16M
EOGSF vs PGLDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EOGSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PGLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EOGSF vs. PGLDF commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EOGSF is a StrongBuy and PGLDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (EOGSF: $2.73 vs. PGLDF: $0.10)
Brand notoriety: EOGSF and PGLDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EOGSF: 100% vs. PGLDF: 51%
Market capitalization -- EOGSF: $1.2B vs. PGLDF: $16M
EOGSF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.2B. PGLDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EOGSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePGLDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EOGSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PGLDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EOGSF is a better buy in the long-term than PGLDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EOGSF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PGLDF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EOGSF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PGLDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EOGSF is a better buy in the short-term than PGLDF.

Price Growth

EOGSF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +8.33% price change this week, while PGLDF (@Precious Metals) price change was -6.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

PGLDF is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.16% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EOGSF($1.2B) has a higher market cap than PGLDF($16M). PGLDF YTD gains are higher at: 136.145 vs. EOGSF (33.171). EOGSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 159M vs. PGLDF (-12.93M). EOGSF has more cash in the bank: 136M vs. PGLDF (378K). PGLDF has less debt than EOGSF: PGLDF (101K) vs EOGSF (49.9M). EOGSF has higher revenues than PGLDF: EOGSF (339M) vs PGLDF (0).
EOGSFPGLDFEOGSF / PGLDF
Capitalization1.2B16M7,469%
EBITDA159M-12.93M-1,230%
Gain YTD33.171136.14524%
P/E Ratio22.20N/A-
Revenue339M0-
Total Cash136M378K35,979%
Total Debt49.9M101K49,406%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EOGSF vs PGLDF: Fundamental Ratings
EOGSF
PGLDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8877
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
18100
SMR RATING
1..100
54100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4837
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
392
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PGLDF's Valuation (68) in the null industry is in the same range as EOGSF (96). This means that PGLDF’s stock grew similarly to EOGSF’s over the last 12 months.

EOGSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PGLDF (100). This means that EOGSF’s stock grew significantly faster than PGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

EOGSF's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PGLDF (100). This means that EOGSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

PGLDF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as EOGSF (48). This means that PGLDF’s stock grew similarly to EOGSF’s over the last 12 months.

PGLDF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EOGSF (39). This means that PGLDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EOGSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EOGSFPGLDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
28%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EOGSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PGLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CMHF27.001.53
+6.01%
Community Heritage Financial, Inc.
SRNW0.10N/A
N/A
Stratos Renewables Corp.
NHNKF15.07N/A
N/A
Nihon Kohden Corp.
MCHHF0.19N/A
N/A
MacMahon Holdings Ltd.
YARIY19.11-0.16
-0.83%
Yara International ASA

EOGSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EOGSF and PLMNF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EOGSF and PLMNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EOGSF
1D Price
Change %
EOGSF100%
+1.49%
PLMNF - EOGSF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PGLDF - EOGSF
12%
Poorly correlated
-4.95%
FSXLF - EOGSF
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
TBXXF - EOGSF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
KDKCF - EOGSF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.91%
More

PGLDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PGLDF and FFMGF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PGLDF and FFMGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PGLDF
1D Price
Change %
PGLDF100%
-4.95%
FFMGF - PGLDF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%
AG - PGLDF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.15%
HYMC - PGLDF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.98%
ZCTSF - PGLDF
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.93%
EXK - PGLDF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
More