Ad is loading...
EOGSF
Price
$2.75
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 7 closing price
TBXXF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

EOGSF vs TBXXF

Header iconEOGSF vs TBXXF Comparison
Open Charts EOGSF vs TBXXFBanner chart's image
Emerald Oil & Gas NL
Price$2.75
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.1K
CapitalizationN/A
TURMALINA METALS
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.1K
CapitalizationN/A
EOGSF vs TBXXF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EOGSF vs. TBXXF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EOGSF is a Hold and TBXXF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (EOGSF: $2.75 vs. TBXXF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: EOGSF and TBXXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EOGSF: 237% vs. TBXXF: 6%
Market capitalization -- EOGSF: $1.2B vs. TBXXF: $13.83M
EOGSF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.2B. TBXXF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $13.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EOGSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTBXXF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EOGSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TBXXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EOGSF is a better buy in the long-term than TBXXF.

Price Growth

EOGSF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TBXXF (@Precious Metals) price change was -13.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EOGSF($1.2B) has a higher market cap than TBXXF($13.8M). EOGSF YTD gains are higher at: 34.146 vs. TBXXF (-78.166). EOGSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 159M vs. TBXXF (-4.46M). EOGSF has more cash in the bank: 136M vs. TBXXF (3.2M). EOGSF has higher revenues than TBXXF: EOGSF (339M) vs TBXXF (0).
EOGSFTBXXFEOGSF / TBXXF
Capitalization1.2B13.8M8,659%
EBITDA159M-4.46M-3,568%
Gain YTD34.146-78.166-44%
P/E Ratio22.20N/A-
Revenue339M0-
Total Cash136M3.2M4,245%
Total Debt49.9MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EOGSF: Fundamental Ratings
EOGSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
14
SMR RATING
1..100
46
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BJK43.250.18
+0.42%
VanEck Gaming ETF
PXF48.710.13
+0.27%
Invesco FTSE RAFI Dev Mkts ex-US ETF
QCLR31.36N/A
N/A
Global X NASDAQ 100® Collar 95-110 ETF
FNY82.81-0.96
-1.15%
First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX® ETF
KOLD71.96-2.52
-3.38%
ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Natrl Gas

EOGSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EOGSF and PLMNF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EOGSF and PLMNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EOGSF
1D Price
Change %
EOGSF100%
N/A
PLMNF - EOGSF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PGLDF - EOGSF
12%
Poorly correlated
-8.43%
FSXLF - EOGSF
12%
Poorly correlated
-3.09%
TBXXF - EOGSF
8%
Poorly correlated
-14.38%
TETOF - EOGSF
6%
Poorly correlated
+5.99%
More

TBXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TBXXF and VAUCF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TBXXF and VAUCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TBXXF
1D Price
Change %
TBXXF100%
-14.38%
VAUCF - TBXXF
24%
Poorly correlated
+7.19%
MNSAF - TBXXF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TFPM - TBXXF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.46%
TAJIF - TBXXF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OMGGF - TBXXF
11%
Poorly correlated
+4.30%
More