EPR
Price
$56.55
Change
-$0.92 (-1.60%)
Updated
Jun 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.16B
47 days until earnings call
LFT
Price
$2.59
Change
-$0.02 (-0.77%)
Updated
Jun 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
131.14M
59 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EPR vs LFT

Header iconEPR vs LFT Comparison
Open Charts EPR vs LFTBanner chart's image
EPR Properties
Price$56.55
Change-$0.92 (-1.60%)
Volume$6.67K
Capitalization3.16B
Lument Finance Trust
Price$2.59
Change-$0.02 (-0.77%)
Volume$230
Capitalization131.14M
EPR vs LFT Comparison Chart
Loading...
EPR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EPR vs. LFT commentary
Jun 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EPR is a Buy and LFT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 13, 2025
Stock price -- (EPR: $57.48 vs. LFT: $2.61)
Brand notoriety: EPR and LFT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EPR: 111% vs. LFT: 72%
Market capitalization -- EPR: $3.16B vs. LFT: $131.14M
EPR [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $3.16B. LFT’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $131.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EPR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLFT’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • EPR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LFT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, LFT is a better buy in the long-term than EPR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EPR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LFT’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EPR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LFT’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LFT is a better buy in the short-term than EPR.

Price Growth

EPR (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +2.64% price change this week, while LFT (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +1.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.67%.

Reported Earning Dates

EPR is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

LFT is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.05% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EPR($3.17B) has a higher market cap than LFT($131M). EPR has higher P/E ratio than LFT: EPR (21.23) vs LFT (8.66). EPR YTD gains are higher at: 33.583 vs. LFT (4.276). LFT has less debt than EPR: LFT (1.19B) vs EPR (3.04B). EPR has higher revenues than LFT: EPR (660M) vs LFT (30.3M).
EPRLFTEPR / LFT
Capitalization3.17B131M2,416%
EBITDA465MN/A-
Gain YTD33.5834.276785%
P/E Ratio21.238.66245%
Revenue660M30.3M2,178%
Total Cash78.1MN/A-
Total Debt3.04B1.19B255%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EPR vs LFT: Fundamental Ratings
EPR
LFT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2619
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1741
SMR RATING
1..100
8219
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4152
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1113
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LFT's Valuation (15) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EPR (64). This means that LFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than EPR’s over the last 12 months.

EPR's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as LFT (41). This means that EPR’s stock grew similarly to LFT’s over the last 12 months.

LFT's SMR Rating (19) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EPR (82). This means that LFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than EPR’s over the last 12 months.

EPR's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as LFT (52). This means that EPR’s stock grew similarly to LFT’s over the last 12 months.

EPR's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as LFT (13). This means that EPR’s stock grew similarly to LFT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EPRLFT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EPR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFSPX14.970.13
+0.88%
DFA Intl Sustainability Core 1
CFNAX85.010.21
+0.25%
American Funds Fundamental Invs 529A
BLRCX11.69N/A
N/A
Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate C
LICSX16.97N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett International Equity R4
HMVFX15.47N/A
N/A
Hartford MidCap Value F

LFT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LFT has been loosely correlated with BNL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LFT jumps, then BNL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LFT
1D Price
Change %
LFT100%
+0.38%
BNL - LFT
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
RITM - LFT
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
EPR - LFT
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
NLY - LFT
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.83%
REFI - LFT
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
More