EQMEF
Price
$0.19
Change
+$0.02 (+11.76%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
12.34M
GFGSF
Price
$0.12
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
18.17M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EQMEF vs GFGSF

Header iconEQMEF vs GFGSF Comparison
Open Charts EQMEF vs GFGSFBanner chart's image
Equity Metals
Price$0.19
Change+$0.02 (+11.76%)
Volume$91.87K
Capitalization12.34M
GFG Resources
Price$0.12
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$124.72K
Capitalization18.17M
EQMEF vs GFGSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EQMEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GFGSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EQMEF vs. GFGSF commentary
Jul 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EQMEF is a StrongBuy and GFGSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 23, 2025
Stock price -- (EQMEF: $0.19 vs. GFGSF: $0.12)
Brand notoriety: EQMEF and GFGSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EQMEF: 45% vs. GFGSF: 131%
Market capitalization -- EQMEF: $12.34M vs. GFGSF: $18.17M
EQMEF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $12.34M. GFGSF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $18.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EQMEF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGFGSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EQMEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GFGSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EQMEF is a better buy in the long-term than GFGSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EQMEF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GFGSF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EQMEF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GFGSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EQMEF is a better buy in the short-term than GFGSF.

Price Growth

EQMEF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +4.35% price change this week, while GFGSF (@Precious Metals) price change was -7.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.70%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.73% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFGSF($18.2M) has a higher market cap than EQMEF($12.3M). EQMEF YTD gains are higher at: 54.819 vs. GFGSF (-6.496). GFGSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.07M vs. EQMEF (-1.8M). GFGSF has more cash in the bank: 4.77M vs. EQMEF (2.79M). EQMEF (0) and GFGSF (0) have equivalent revenues.
EQMEFGFGSFEQMEF / GFGSF
Capitalization12.3M18.2M68%
EBITDA-1.8M-1.07M169%
Gain YTD54.819-6.496-844%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash2.79M4.77M58%
Total DebtN/A129K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EQMEF vs GFGSF: Fundamental Ratings
EQMEF
GFGSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1211
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
50100
SMR RATING
1..100
9884
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3849
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GFGSF's Valuation (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EQMEF (93). This means that GFGSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EQMEF’s over the last 12 months.

EQMEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GFGSF (100). This means that EQMEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GFGSF’s over the last 12 months.

GFGSF's SMR Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as EQMEF (98). This means that GFGSF’s stock grew similarly to EQMEF’s over the last 12 months.

EQMEF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as GFGSF (49). This means that EQMEF’s stock grew similarly to GFGSF’s over the last 12 months.

EQMEF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GFGSF (100). This means that EQMEF’s stock grew significantly faster than GFGSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EQMEFGFGSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EQMEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GFGSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VNPKF0.42N/A
+1.18%
Verde Agritech Ltd.
DLVHF25.37N/A
N/A
Delivery Hero AG NA
FFWC38.89N/A
N/A
FFW Corporation
TVAHF18.04N/A
N/A
TV Asahi Holdings Corp.
HAWLN14.50N/A
N/A
Hawaiian Electric Co., Inc.

EQMEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EQMEF has been loosely correlated with HL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EQMEF jumps, then HL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EQMEF
1D Price
Change %
EQMEF100%
+7.03%
HL - EQMEF
48%
Loosely correlated
+4.12%
MUX - EQMEF
46%
Loosely correlated
+3.47%
MAG - EQMEF
46%
Loosely correlated
+3.77%
CDE - EQMEF
46%
Loosely correlated
+4.19%
WPM - EQMEF
45%
Loosely correlated
+3.50%
More

GFGSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GFGSF and WVMDF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GFGSF and WVMDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFGSF
1D Price
Change %
GFGSF100%
-1.86%
WVMDF - GFGSF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
EQMEF - GFGSF
20%
Poorly correlated
+7.03%
ANGPY - GFGSF
20%
Poorly correlated
+6.27%
BHLL - GFGSF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.70%
GBBFF - GFGSF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More