EQMEF
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.02 (-12.50%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
12.34M
MAG
Price
$15.76
Change
-$1.13 (-6.69%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.12B
31 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EQMEF vs MAG

Header iconEQMEF vs MAG Comparison
Open Charts EQMEF vs MAGBanner chart's image
Equity Metals
Price$0.14
Change-$0.02 (-12.50%)
Volume$159.37K
Capitalization12.34M
MAG Silver
Price$15.76
Change-$1.13 (-6.69%)
Volume$1.28M
Capitalization1.12B
EQMEF vs MAG Comparison Chart
Loading...
MAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EQMEF vs. MAG commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EQMEF is a Hold and MAG is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (EQMEF: $0.14 vs. MAG: $15.76)
Brand notoriety: EQMEF and MAG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EQMEF: 145% vs. MAG: 224%
Market capitalization -- EQMEF: $12.34M vs. MAG: $1.12B
EQMEF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $12.34M. MAG’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EQMEF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMAG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EQMEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MAG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EQMEF is a better buy in the long-term than MAG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MAG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MAG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

EQMEF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -8.26% price change this week, while MAG (@Precious Metals) price change was -3.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.98%.

Reported Earning Dates

MAG is expected to report earnings on May 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.88% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAG($1.12B) has a higher market cap than EQMEF($12.3M). EQMEF YTD gains are higher at: 17.540 vs. MAG (15.882). EQMEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.8M vs. MAG (-13.89M). MAG has more cash in the bank: 68.7M vs. EQMEF (2.79M). EQMEF (0) and MAG (0) have equivalent revenues.
EQMEFMAGEQMEF / MAG
Capitalization12.3M1.12B1%
EBITDA-1.8M-13.89M13%
Gain YTD17.54015.882110%
P/E RatioN/A22.98-
Revenue00-
Total Cash2.79M68.7M4%
Total DebtN/A154K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EQMEF vs MAG: Fundamental Ratings
EQMEF
MAG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5025
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6365
SMR RATING
1..100
9855
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4341
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
177
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EQMEF's Valuation (94) in the null industry is in the same range as MAG (94) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that EQMEF’s stock grew similarly to MAG’s over the last 12 months.

EQMEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as MAG (65) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that EQMEF’s stock grew similarly to MAG’s over the last 12 months.

MAG's SMR Rating (55) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EQMEF (98) in the null industry. This means that MAG’s stock grew somewhat faster than EQMEF’s over the last 12 months.

MAG's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as EQMEF (43) in the null industry. This means that MAG’s stock grew similarly to EQMEF’s over the last 12 months.

EQMEF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MAG (77) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that EQMEF’s stock grew significantly faster than MAG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MAG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EMGAX26.690.17
+0.64%
Allspring Emerging Markets Equity A
VEMIX29.230.04
+0.14%
Vanguard Emerging Mkts Stock Idx Instl
VRGEX33.50-0.34
-1.00%
Virtus Duff & Phelps Glb Rl Estt Secs R6
NNTWX32.28-0.67
-2.03%
Nicholas II N
LMVYX28.68-0.83
-2.81%
Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value I

EQMEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EQMEF has been loosely correlated with HL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EQMEF jumps, then HL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EQMEF
1D Price
Change %
EQMEF100%
-10.57%
HL - EQMEF
48%
Loosely correlated
-7.28%
MUX - EQMEF
46%
Loosely correlated
-6.42%
MAG - EQMEF
46%
Loosely correlated
-6.69%
CDE - EQMEF
46%
Loosely correlated
-10.49%
WPM - EQMEF
45%
Loosely correlated
-2.72%
More