EQMEF
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 7 closing price
Capitalization
12.34M
RDGMF
Price
$0.12
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 7 closing price
Capitalization
14.09M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EQMEF vs RDGMF

Header iconEQMEF vs RDGMF Comparison
Open Charts EQMEF vs RDGMFBanner chart's image
Equity Metals
Price$0.17
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$222.08K
Capitalization12.34M
RIDGELINE MINERALS
Price$0.12
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$907.66K
Capitalization14.09M
EQMEF vs RDGMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EQMEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RDGMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EQMEF vs. RDGMF commentary
Jul 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EQMEF is a Buy and RDGMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 09, 2025
Stock price -- (EQMEF: $0.17 vs. RDGMF: $0.12)
Brand notoriety: EQMEF and RDGMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EQMEF: 121% vs. RDGMF: 773%
Market capitalization -- EQMEF: $12.34M vs. RDGMF: $14.09M
EQMEF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $12.34M. RDGMF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $14.09M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EQMEF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRDGMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EQMEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RDGMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EQMEF is a better buy in the long-term than RDGMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EQMEF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RDGMF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EQMEF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RDGMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EQMEF is a better buy in the short-term than RDGMF.

Price Growth

EQMEF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -3.70% price change this week, while RDGMF (@Precious Metals) price change was -9.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +52.46%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.19% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RDGMF($14.1M) has a higher market cap than EQMEF($12.3M). EQMEF YTD gains are higher at: 42.172 vs. RDGMF (27.895). RDGMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -941.15K vs. EQMEF (-1.8M). EQMEF has more cash in the bank: 2.79M vs. RDGMF (416K). EQMEF (0) and RDGMF (0) have equivalent revenues.
EQMEFRDGMFEQMEF / RDGMF
Capitalization12.3M14.1M87%
EBITDA-1.8M-941.15K192%
Gain YTD42.17227.895151%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash2.79M416K670%
Total DebtN/A74.7K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EQMEF: Fundamental Ratings
EQMEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
13
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
59
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EQMEFRDGMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EQMEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RDGMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PTRUF1.030.03
+2.89%
Petrus Resources Ltd.
DPXCF0.04N/A
N/A
DelphX Capital Markets Inc.
LSIIF37.13N/A
N/A
Lisi
RMSYF25.18N/A
N/A
Ramsay Health Care Ltd.
CNLHO35.75N/A
N/A
Connecticut Light & Power Co. (The)

EQMEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EQMEF has been loosely correlated with HL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EQMEF jumps, then HL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EQMEF
1D Price
Change %
EQMEF100%
+0.53%
HL - EQMEF
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.48%
MUX - EQMEF
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
MAG - EQMEF
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.37%
CDE - EQMEF
46%
Loosely correlated
+4.06%
WPM - EQMEF
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.26%
More

RDGMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RDGMF and ISVLF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RDGMF and ISVLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RDGMF
1D Price
Change %
RDGMF100%
+2.92%
ISVLF - RDGMF
28%
Poorly correlated
+11.25%
WEXPF - RDGMF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
GLGDF - RDGMF
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.82%
EQMEF - RDGMF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
TORXF - RDGMF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.09%
More