Ad is loading...
ERDCF
Price
$0.43
Change
+$0.02 (+4.88%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
TGB
Price
$1.97
Change
-$0.03 (-1.50%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
93 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ERDCF vs TGB

Header iconERDCF vs TGB Comparison
Open Charts ERDCF vs TGBBanner chart's image
Erdene Resource Development
Price$0.43
Change+$0.02 (+4.88%)
Volume$25.06K
CapitalizationN/A
Taseko Mines
Price$1.97
Change-$0.03 (-1.50%)
Volume$35.38M
CapitalizationN/A
ERDCF vs TGB Comparison Chart
Loading...
ERDCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
TGB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ERDCF vs. TGB commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERDCF is a Hold and TGB is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (ERDCF: $0.43 vs. TGB: $1.97)
Brand notoriety: ERDCF and TGB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ERDCF: 40% vs. TGB: 808%
Market capitalization -- ERDCF: $97.43M vs. TGB: $626.06M
ERDCF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $97.43M. TGB’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $626.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ERDCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTGB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ERDCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TGB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ERDCF is a better buy in the long-term than TGB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ERDCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TGB’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ERDCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TGB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ERDCF is a better buy in the short-term than TGB.

Price Growth

ERDCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -6.47% price change this week, while TGB (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -17.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.62%.

Reported Earning Dates

TGB is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-1.39% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TGB($626M) has a higher market cap than ERDCF($97.4M). ERDCF YTD gains are higher at: 61.464 vs. TGB (40.714). TGB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 125M vs. ERDCF (-5.57M). TGB has more cash in the bank: 83.5M vs. ERDCF (11.7M). ERDCF has less debt than TGB: ERDCF (7M) vs TGB (707M). TGB has higher revenues than ERDCF: TGB (472M) vs ERDCF (0).
ERDCFTGBERDCF / TGB
Capitalization97.4M626M16%
EBITDA-5.57M125M-4%
Gain YTD61.46440.714151%
P/E RatioN/A10.57-
Revenue0472M-
Total Cash11.7M83.5M14%
Total Debt7M707M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ERDCF vs TGB: Fundamental Ratings
ERDCF
TGB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5052
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4137
SMR RATING
1..100
9163
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4062
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5996
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a37

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TGB's Valuation (80) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as ERDCF (93) in the null industry. This means that TGB’s stock grew similarly to ERDCF’s over the last 12 months.

TGB's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as ERDCF (41) in the null industry. This means that TGB’s stock grew similarly to ERDCF’s over the last 12 months.

TGB's SMR Rating (63) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as ERDCF (91) in the null industry. This means that TGB’s stock grew similarly to ERDCF’s over the last 12 months.

ERDCF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as TGB (62) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that ERDCF’s stock grew similarly to TGB’s over the last 12 months.

ERDCF's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TGB (96) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that ERDCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TGB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ERDCFTGB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ERDCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
TGB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FAVTX25.37-0.03
-0.12%
Fidelity Advisor Equity Value M
MALVX33.43-0.18
-0.54%
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Val Instl
NBMTX18.90-0.15
-0.79%
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Tr
ZSCCX37.47-0.40
-1.06%
Zacks Small-Cap Core Inv
PLPIX28.74-0.38
-1.30%
Principal Large Cap S&P 500 Index R1

ERDCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ERDCF has been loosely correlated with CSCCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ERDCF jumps, then CSCCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ERDCF
1D Price
Change %
ERDCF100%
+3.67%
CSCCF - ERDCF
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.89%
FCX - ERDCF
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.32%
SCCO - ERDCF
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
TGB - ERDCF
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.50%
HBM - ERDCF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
More

TGB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TGB has been closely correlated with HBM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TGB jumps, then HBM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TGB
1D Price
Change %
TGB100%
-1.50%
HBM - TGB
77%
Closely correlated
-0.12%
FCX - TGB
74%
Closely correlated
-1.32%
SCCO - TGB
73%
Closely correlated
-1.03%
LUNMF - TGB
69%
Closely correlated
+0.05%
TECK - TGB
69%
Closely correlated
-0.86%
More