ERLFF
Price
$1.48
Change
-$0.15 (-9.20%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
198.35M
65 days until earnings call
FCX
Price
$41.48
Change
-$0.21 (-0.50%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
67.89B
39 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ERLFF vs FCX

Header iconERLFF vs FCX Comparison
Open Charts ERLFF vs FCXBanner chart's image
Entree Resources
Price$1.48
Change-$0.15 (-9.20%)
Volume$293.66K
Capitalization198.35M
Freeport-McMoran
Price$41.48
Change-$0.21 (-0.50%)
Volume$8.5M
Capitalization67.89B
ERLFF vs FCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
ERLFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FCX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ERLFF vs. FCX commentary
Jun 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERLFF is a Hold and FCX is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 08, 2025
Stock price -- (ERLFF: $1.48 vs. FCX: $41.48)
Brand notoriety: ERLFF: Not notable vs. FCX: Notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ERLFF: 1248% vs. FCX: 52%
Market capitalization -- ERLFF: $198.35M vs. FCX: $67.89B
ERLFF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $198.35M. FCX’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $67.89B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ERLFF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFCX’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ERLFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FCX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ERLFF is a better buy in the long-term than FCX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ERLFF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FCX’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ERLFF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • FCX’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FCX is a better buy in the short-term than ERLFF.

Price Growth

ERLFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -11.14% price change this week, while FCX (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +7.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

ERLFF is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

FCX is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.84% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCX($67.9B) has a higher market cap than ERLFF($198M). FCX YTD gains are higher at: 9.832 vs. ERLFF (-12.979). FCX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.59B vs. ERLFF (-8.93M). FCX has more cash in the bank: 4.76B vs. ERLFF (5.94M). ERLFF has less debt than FCX: ERLFF (11.8M) vs FCX (9.85B). FCX has higher revenues than ERLFF: FCX (22.9B) vs ERLFF (0).
ERLFFFCXERLFF / FCX
Capitalization198M67.9B0%
EBITDA-8.93M8.59B-0%
Gain YTD-12.9799.832-132%
P/E RatioN/A36.98-
Revenue022.9B-
Total Cash5.94M4.76B0%
Total Debt11.8M9.85B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ERLFF vs FCX: Fundamental Ratings
ERLFF
FCX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5015
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1732
SMR RATING
1..100
9267
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4648
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10080
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ERLFF's Valuation (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCX (72) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that ERLFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCX’s over the last 12 months.

ERLFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as FCX (32) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that ERLFF’s stock grew similarly to FCX’s over the last 12 months.

FCX's SMR Rating (67) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as ERLFF (92) in the null industry. This means that FCX’s stock grew similarly to ERLFF’s over the last 12 months.

ERLFF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as FCX (48) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that ERLFF’s stock grew similarly to FCX’s over the last 12 months.

FCX's P/E Growth Rating (80) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as ERLFF (100) in the null industry. This means that FCX’s stock grew similarly to ERLFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ERLFFFCX
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ERLFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FCX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AEVA20.901.85
+9.71%
Aeva Technologies Inc
WTTR8.850.24
+2.79%
Select Water Solutions
ACLX68.101.85
+2.79%
Arcellx
EME488.824.76
+0.98%
EMCOR Group
BOSC4.50-0.08
-1.75%
B.O.S. Better Online Solutions

ERLFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ERLFF and LUNMF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ERLFF and LUNMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ERLFF
1D Price
Change %
ERLFF100%
-9.51%
LUNMF - ERLFF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
SOUHY - ERLFF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.41%
FCX - ERLFF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
HBM - ERLFF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.52%
SCCO - ERLFF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
More

FCX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCX has been closely correlated with TECK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCX jumps, then TECK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCX
1D Price
Change %
FCX100%
-0.50%
TECK - FCX
90%
Closely correlated
-0.08%
SCCO - FCX
90%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
HBM - FCX
83%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
LUNMF - FCX
79%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
ERO - FCX
76%
Closely correlated
-0.69%
More