ERO
Price
$15.03
Change
-$0.64 (-4.08%)
Updated
Jun 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.98B
47 days until earnings call
LITOF
Price
$0.38
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
309.1M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ERO vs LITOF

Header iconERO vs LITOF Comparison
Open Charts ERO vs LITOFBanner chart's image
Ero Copper
Price$15.03
Change-$0.64 (-4.08%)
Volume$4.69K
Capitalization1.98B
Frontier Lithium
Price$0.38
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$195.19K
Capitalization309.1M
ERO vs LITOF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ERO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LITOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ERO vs. LITOF commentary
Jun 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERO is a Hold and LITOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 14, 2025
Stock price -- (ERO: $15.03 vs. LITOF: $0.38)
Brand notoriety: ERO and LITOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ERO: 151% vs. LITOF: 489%
Market capitalization -- ERO: $1.98B vs. LITOF: $309.1M
ERO [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.98B. LITOF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $309.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ERO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLITOF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ERO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LITOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ERO is a better buy in the long-term than LITOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ERO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LITOF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ERO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LITOF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ERO is a better buy in the short-term than LITOF.

Price Growth

ERO (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -4.81% price change this week, while LITOF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +0.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

ERO is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

LITOF is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.32% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ERO($1.98B) has a higher market cap than LITOF($309M). LITOF YTD gains are higher at: 28.428 vs. ERO (11.499). ERO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 208M vs. LITOF (-20.51M). ERO has more cash in the bank: 112M vs. LITOF (30.2M). LITOF has less debt than ERO: LITOF (196K) vs ERO (446M). ERO has higher revenues than LITOF: ERO (427M) vs LITOF (0).
EROLITOFERO / LITOF
Capitalization1.98B309M641%
EBITDA208M-20.51M-1,014%
Gain YTD11.49928.42840%
P/E Ratio19.67N/A-
Revenue427M0-
Total Cash112M30.2M371%
Total Debt446M196K227,551%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ERO vs LITOF: Fundamental Ratings
ERO
LITOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1828
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7288
SMR RATING
1..100
8795
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4462
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LITOF's Valuation (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ERO (85). This means that LITOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ERO’s over the last 12 months.

ERO's Profit vs Risk Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as LITOF (88). This means that ERO’s stock grew similarly to LITOF’s over the last 12 months.

ERO's SMR Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as LITOF (95). This means that ERO’s stock grew similarly to LITOF’s over the last 12 months.

ERO's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as LITOF (62). This means that ERO’s stock grew similarly to LITOF’s over the last 12 months.

ERO's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LITOF (100). This means that ERO’s stock grew significantly faster than LITOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EROLITOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ERO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LITOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IYSMX16.38N/A
N/A
Macquarie Smid Cap Core Fund Class R
PBAIX15.40N/A
N/A
BlackRock Tactical Opportunities Instl
MSSVX7.48N/A
N/A
AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth N
GGQPX22.57N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Growth P
FNNEX64.67-0.90
-1.37%
American Funds New Economy 529-F-3

ERO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ERO has been closely correlated with SCCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ERO jumps, then SCCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ERO
1D Price
Change %
ERO100%
-4.08%
SCCO - ERO
78%
Closely correlated
-1.23%
HBM - ERO
76%
Closely correlated
+0.83%
FCX - ERO
76%
Closely correlated
-0.58%
TECK - ERO
74%
Closely correlated
+1.66%
LUNMF - ERO
71%
Closely correlated
+0.29%
More

LITOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LITOF and PILBF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LITOF and PILBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LITOF
1D Price
Change %
LITOF100%
+1.05%
PILBF - LITOF
27%
Poorly correlated
-3.33%
ERO - LITOF
27%
Poorly correlated
-4.08%
AAGFF - LITOF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.30%
EMX - LITOF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
SGML - LITOF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.14%
More