ERO
Price
$12.81
Change
-$0.59 (-4.40%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
84 days until earnings call
NTMFF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.01 (-12.50%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

ERO vs NTMFF

Header iconERO vs NTMFF Comparison
Open Charts ERO vs NTMFFBanner chart's image
Ero Copper
Price$12.81
Change-$0.59 (-4.40%)
Volume$529.66K
CapitalizationN/A
NEOTECH METALS
Price$0.07
Change-$0.01 (-12.50%)
Volume$31.32K
CapitalizationN/A
ERO vs NTMFF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ERO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NTMFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ERO vs. NTMFF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERO is a Hold and NTMFF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (ERO: $12.81 vs. NTMFF: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: ERO and NTMFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ERO: 136% vs. NTMFF: 302%
Market capitalization -- ERO: $1.98B vs. NTMFF: $0
ERO [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.98B. NTMFF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ERO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNTMFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ERO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NTMFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ERO and NTMFF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ERO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTMFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ERO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NTMFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ERO is a better buy in the short-term than NTMFF.

Price Growth

ERO (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -11.72% price change this week, while NTMFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +6.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -3.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

ERO is expected to report earnings on Mar 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-3.05% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ERO YTD gains are higher at: -18.873 vs. NTMFF (-96.879).
ERONTMFFERO / NTMFF
Capitalization1.98BN/A-
EBITDA208MN/A-
Gain YTD-18.873-96.87919%
P/E Ratio19.67N/A-
Revenue427MN/A-
Total Cash112MN/A-
Total Debt446MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ERO: Fundamental Ratings
ERO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
57
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
87
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
87
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ERONTMFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ERO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NTMFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SOCUX20.23-0.49
-2.36%
Spirit of America Utilities C
VIAAX39.19-0.96
-2.39%
Vanguard Intl Div Apprec Idx Adm
SLESX11.04-0.28
-2.47%
Invesco Income Advantage U.S. Fund R6
ALTFX142.91-3.76
-2.56%
AB Sustainable Global Thematic A
HRMDX14.21-0.38
-2.60%
Heartland Mid Cap Value Investor

ERO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ERO has been closely correlated with HBM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ERO jumps, then HBM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ERO
1D Price
Change %
ERO100%
-4.40%
HBM - ERO
73%
Closely correlated
-6.22%
SCCO - ERO
73%
Closely correlated
-3.91%
FCX - ERO
72%
Closely correlated
-4.70%
LUNMF - ERO
71%
Closely correlated
-4.03%
TECK - ERO
68%
Closely correlated
-4.68%
More

NTMFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NTMFF and ERO have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NTMFF and ERO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NTMFF
1D Price
Change %
NTMFF100%
-4.97%
ERO - NTMFF
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.40%
GUELF - NTMFF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
COPR - NTMFF
5%
Poorly correlated
-33.60%
ABAT - NTMFF
3%
Poorly correlated
+2.33%
VMXXF - NTMFF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More