ERO
Price
$14.15
Change
+$0.25 (+1.80%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.98B
53 days until earnings call
TCKRF
Price
$41.88
Change
+$1.19 (+2.92%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
20.17B
Ad is loading...

ERO vs TCKRF

Header iconERO vs TCKRF Comparison
Open Charts ERO vs TCKRFBanner chart's image
Ero Copper
Price$14.15
Change+$0.25 (+1.80%)
Volume$318.05K
Capitalization1.98B
Teck Resources
Price$41.88
Change+$1.19 (+2.92%)
Volume$515
Capitalization20.17B
ERO vs TCKRF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ERO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TCKRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ERO vs. TCKRF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERO is a Hold and TCKRF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (ERO: $14.15 vs. TCKRF: $41.88)
Brand notoriety: ERO and TCKRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ERO: 77% vs. TCKRF: 91%
Market capitalization -- ERO: $1.98B vs. TCKRF: $20.17B
ERO [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.98B. TCKRF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $20.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ERO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTCKRF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ERO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TCKRF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TCKRF is a better buy in the long-term than ERO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ERO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TCKRF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ERO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TCKRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TCKRF is a better buy in the short-term than ERO.

Price Growth

ERO (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -1.80% price change this week, while TCKRF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +2.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

ERO is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.34% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TCKRF($20.2B) has a higher market cap than ERO($1.98B). ERO has higher P/E ratio than TCKRF: ERO (19.67) vs TCKRF (12.90). ERO YTD gains are higher at: 4.970 vs. TCKRF (3.144). TCKRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.61B vs. ERO (208M). TCKRF has more cash in the bank: 1.34B vs. ERO (112M). ERO has less debt than TCKRF: ERO (446M) vs TCKRF (10.7B). TCKRF has higher revenues than ERO: TCKRF (14B) vs ERO (427M).
EROTCKRFERO / TCKRF
Capitalization1.98B20.2B10%
EBITDA208M5.61B4%
Gain YTD4.9703.144158%
P/E Ratio19.6712.90153%
Revenue427M14B3%
Total Cash112M1.34B8%
Total Debt446M10.7B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ERO vs TCKRF: Fundamental Ratings
ERO
TCKRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3350
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10047
SMR RATING
1..100
8888
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6159
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
316
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TCKRF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ERO (83). This means that TCKRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ERO’s over the last 12 months.

TCKRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ERO (100). This means that TCKRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ERO’s over the last 12 months.

TCKRF's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as ERO (88). This means that TCKRF’s stock grew similarly to ERO’s over the last 12 months.

TCKRF's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as ERO (61). This means that TCKRF’s stock grew similarly to ERO’s over the last 12 months.

ERO's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as TCKRF (16). This means that ERO’s stock grew similarly to TCKRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EROTCKRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
79%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
82%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
83%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ERO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TCKRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ANWPX63.390.41
+0.65%
American Funds New Perspective A
SRFMX14.310.08
+0.56%
Sarofim Equity
LIDAX7.940.03
+0.38%
Lord Abbett International Value A
FKKSX48.810.17
+0.35%
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap R
WHGAX20.850.03
+0.14%
Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund A

ERO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ERO has been closely correlated with HBM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ERO jumps, then HBM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ERO
1D Price
Change %
ERO100%
+1.80%
HBM - ERO
72%
Closely correlated
-0.58%
SCCO - ERO
72%
Closely correlated
+0.72%
LUNMF - ERO
71%
Closely correlated
-2.08%
FCX - ERO
70%
Closely correlated
+0.47%
TECK - ERO
68%
Closely correlated
+1.89%
More

TCKRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TCKRF and AFMJF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TCKRF and AFMJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TCKRF
1D Price
Change %
TCKRF100%
+2.92%
AFMJF - TCKRF
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.84%
LTRBF - TCKRF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ERO - TCKRF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.80%
IE - TCKRF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.61%
LUNMF - TCKRF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.08%
More