Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ERSMX vs TRQZX
ERSMX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts ERSMX vs TRQZX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap R
Price$32.92
Change+$0.14 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.49B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$103.93
Change+$0.12 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28.03B
ERSMX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 28B vs. ERSMX (14.5B). TRQZX pays higher dividends than ERSMX: TRQZX (0.61) vs ERSMX (0.00). ERSMX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: ERSMX (16 years) vs TRQZX (5 years). ERSMX (1.37) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). TRQZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. ERSMX (9.00). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than ERSMX: TRQZX (0) vs ERSMX (1000). ERSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.18 vs. TRQZX (-0.51). ERSMX return over 5 years is better than : 15.46 vs. TRQZX (10.86).
| ERSMX | TRQZX | ERSMX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.61 | 225% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.800 | 3.068 | 26% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.5B | 28B | 52% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.61 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.18 | -0.51 | -624% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.06 | 17.44 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.46 | 10.86 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.55 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement