ESCA vs MCFT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESCA is a Hold and MCFT is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ESCA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMCFT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ESCA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MCFT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ESCA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCFT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ESCA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- MCFT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
ESCA (@Recreational Products) experienced а +0.39% price change this week, while MCFT (@Recreational Products) price change was -1.79% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +5.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.58%.
Reported Earning Dates
ESCA is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2025.
MCFT is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Recreational Products (+5.19% weekly)The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).
| ESCA | MCFT | ESCA / MCFT | |
| Capitalization | 187M | 404M | 46% |
| EBITDA | 22.9M | 90M | 25% |
| Gain YTD | 9.002 | -2.150 | -419% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.03 | 7.14 | 267% |
| Revenue | 270M | 537M | 50% |
| Total Cash | 919K | 109M | 1% |
| Total Debt | 81.2M | 51.4M | 158% |
ESCA | MCFT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 71 | 11 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 17 Undervalued | 96 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 52 | 77 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 77 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ESCA's Valuation (17) in the Recreational Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for MCFT (96). This means that ESCA’s stock grew significantly faster than MCFT’s over the last 12 months.
ESCA's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as MCFT (77). This means that ESCA’s stock grew similarly to MCFT’s over the last 12 months.
ESCA's SMR Rating (77) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as MCFT (90). This means that ESCA’s stock grew similarly to MCFT’s over the last 12 months.
ESCA's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as MCFT (59). This means that ESCA’s stock grew similarly to MCFT’s over the last 12 months.
MCFT's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Recreational Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for ESCA (87). This means that MCFT’s stock grew significantly faster than ESCA’s over the last 12 months.
| ESCA | MCFT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 76% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 24 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 63% |
ESCA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESCA has been loosely correlated with BC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESCA jumps, then BC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESCA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESCA | 100% | -0.84% | ||
| BC - ESCA | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.28% | ||
| WGO - ESCA | 39% Loosely correlated | +3.22% | ||
| MPX - ESCA | 39% Loosely correlated | +5.92% | ||
| MCFT - ESCA | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.91% | ||
| LCII - ESCA | 39% Loosely correlated | +2.94% | ||
More | ||||
MCFT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCFT has been closely correlated with MBUU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCFT jumps, then MBUU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCFT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCFT | 100% | +1.91% | ||
| MBUU - MCFT | 71% Closely correlated | +1.09% | ||
| BC - MCFT | 68% Closely correlated | +1.28% | ||
| LCII - MCFT | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.94% | ||
| WGO - MCFT | 61% Loosely correlated | +3.22% | ||
| PII - MCFT | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
More | ||||