ESML
Price
$56.64
Change
+$0.31 (+0.55%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Net Assets
2.95B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IWM
Price
$305.09
Change
+$1.59 (+0.52%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Net Assets
82.83B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ESML vs IWM

ESML vs IWM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 15, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML) vs. iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM)

Key Takeaways

  • iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML) applies an environmental, social, and governance (ESG) screen to small-cap U.S. equities, resulting in approximately 905 holdings and a lower expense ratio of 0.17% compared to iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM).
  • IWM tracks the broad Russell 2000 Index with nearly 2,000 holdings, offering comprehensive small-cap exposure without ESG filters and an expense ratio of 0.19%.
  • Both ETFs target U.S. small-cap stocks but differ in diversification and thematic emphasis, with ESML emphasizing companies with favorable ESG profiles and IWM providing broader market-cap-weighted representation.
  • Sector allocations show overlap in industrials, financials, and health care, yet ESML features higher information technology weighting due to its ESG methodology.
  • Structural differences include ESML’s focus on ESG leaders within the small-cap universe versus IWM’s pure size-based selection, influencing risk profiles and investor suitability.
  • Cost efficiency and thematic alignment are key differentiators for long-term positioning in small-cap strategies.

Introduction

Small-capitalization U.S. equities represent a distinct segment of the market characterized by higher growth potential alongside elevated volatility relative to large-cap counterparts. The iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) both provide access to this universe yet employ different methodologies. ESML incorporates ESG criteria while IWM delivers unfiltered exposure. Investors seeking either core small-cap allocation or ESG-integrated strategies frequently evaluate these options side by side. The comparison highlights structural distinctions that affect diversification, costs, and thematic fit within diversified portfolios.

iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML) Overview

The iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML) seeks to track the MSCI USA Small Cap Extended ESG Focus Index. This passive strategy applies business involvement screens and favors companies with stronger environmental, social, and governance profiles while maintaining small-cap characteristics. The fund holds approximately 905 securities. Sector allocations as of recent data include industrials at 18.56%, information technology at 18.36%, financials at 14.79%, and health care at 14.12%. The expense ratio stands at 0.17%. As a physically replicated, market-cap-weighted ETF, it rebalances periodically to align with the underlying index. Distinguishing features include the ESG overlay that reduces exposure to certain controversial industries while preserving broad small-cap representation.

iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) Overview

The iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) tracks the Russell 2000 Index, providing exposure to approximately 1,965 small-cap U.S. companies. This passive, market-cap-weighted approach captures the bottom segment of the Russell 3000 Index without additional thematic screens. Sector allocations feature health care near 20%, financials near 19%, industrials near 14%, and information technology near 13%. The expense ratio is 0.19%. The fund employs full replication and undergoes annual reconstitution aligned with the index provider’s schedule. Key characteristics include high liquidity and comprehensive coverage of the small-cap segment, making it a standard benchmark vehicle for U.S. small-cap equity exposure.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

U.S. small-cap equities operate in an environment shaped by domestic economic growth, interest rate expectations, and sector-specific earnings trends. Financials and industrials remain sensitive to borrowing costs and infrastructure spending, while health care and technology benefit from innovation cycles. ESG considerations continue to influence capital allocation, with screened strategies attracting flows from investors prioritizing sustainability metrics alongside returns. Macro drivers such as inflation moderation and potential policy shifts affect small-cap performance relative to larger peers. Regulatory developments around corporate disclosure and environmental standards add another layer of consideration for ESG-tilted funds.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Both ETFs exhibit sensitivity to small-cap rotations and broader market sentiment during recent market cycles. ESML’s ESG constraints can lead to modest differences in volatility and sector momentum compared with the broader IWM benchmark. In periods favoring growth-oriented or sustainability themes, the ESG-aware approach may enhance relative positioning. Conversely, IWM’s wider diversification supports more consistent tracking of the overall small-cap universe across earnings seasons and economic expansions. Relative positioning depends on investor preference for thematic integration versus maximum breadth within the small-cap space.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to uncover additional opportunities aligned with your strategy.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favor to iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML). Lower expense ratio, combined with ESG integration that aligns with evolving investor preferences and sector momentum in technology and industrials, supports this assessment while acknowledging IWM’s advantages in breadth and benchmark fidelity.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ESML vs. IWM commentary
Aug 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESML is a Buy and IWM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWM has more net assets: 82.8B vs. ESML (2.95B). IWM (24.456) and ESML (23.727) have matching annual dividend yield . ESML was incepted earlier than IWM: ESML (8 years) vs IWM (26 years). ESML (0.17) has a lower expense ratio than IWM (0.19). ESML has a higher turnover IWM (18.00) vs IWM (18.00).
ESMLIWMESML / IWM
Gain YTD23.72724.45697%
Net Assets2.95B82.8B4%
Total Expense Ratio0.170.1989%
Turnover35.0018.00194%
Yield0.930.91101%
Fund Existence8 years26 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ESMLIWM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ESML
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IWM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SOCL46.700.78
+1.71%
Global X Social Media ETF
XIDV39.220.27
+0.69%
Franklin Intl Div Mltplr Idx ETF
SDOG73.820.24
+0.33%
ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
CAFX24.51-0.04
-0.16%
Congress Intermediate Bond ETF
EUIG49.88-0.16
-0.33%
iShares Euro IG Corp Bd USD H ETF

ESML and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESML has been closely correlated with FRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ESML jumps, then FRT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESML
1D Price
Change %
ESML100%
+0.54%
FRT - ESML
69%
Closely correlated
-0.42%
AYI - ESML
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
USFD - ESML
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.06%
EME - ESML
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
FTI - ESML
34%
Loosely correlated
+2.53%
More

IWM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWM has been closely correlated with APG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWM jumps, then APG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IWM
1D Price
Change %
IWM100%
+0.52%
APG - IWM
68%
Closely correlated
+1.08%
SSD - IWM
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
CVNA - IWM
50%
Loosely correlated
+2.56%
FIX - IWM
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.69%
ONTO - IWM
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.81%
More