ESRT vs GT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESRT is a Buy and GT is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ESRT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ESRT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- GT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ESRT’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GT’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ESRT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
- GT’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
ESRT (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -2.38% price change this week, while GT (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +5.26% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +2.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.72%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +4.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.75%.
Reported Earning Dates
ESRT is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.
GT is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+2.23% weekly)A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.
@Auto Parts: OEM (+4.75% weekly)OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.
| ESRT | GT | ESRT / GT | |
| Capitalization | 1.58B | 3.9B | 40% |
| EBITDA | 379M | 856M | 44% |
| Gain YTD | -32.262 | 22.222 | -145% |
| P/E Ratio | 32.07 | 769.23 | 4% |
| Revenue | 740M | 20.1B | 4% |
| Total Cash | 347M | 902M | 38% |
| Total Debt | 2.27B | 8.65B | 26% |
ESRT | GT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 22 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 95 Overvalued | 76 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 71 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 84 | 88 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 70 | 30 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 95 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GT's Valuation (76) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is in the same range as ESRT (95) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that GT’s stock grew similarly to ESRT’s over the last 12 months.
GT's Profit vs Risk Rating (71) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is in the same range as ESRT (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that GT’s stock grew similarly to ESRT’s over the last 12 months.
ESRT's SMR Rating (84) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as GT (88) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that ESRT’s stock grew similarly to GT’s over the last 12 months.
GT's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ESRT (84) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that GT’s stock grew somewhat faster than ESRT’s over the last 12 months.
GT's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ESRT (70) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that GT’s stock grew somewhat faster than ESRT’s over the last 12 months.
| ESRT | GT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 1 day ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 1 day ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 6 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 71% | 22 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 1 day ago 76% |
ESRT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESRT has been closely correlated with KRC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ESRT jumps, then KRC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESRT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESRT | 100% | -3.60% | ||
| KRC - ESRT | 74% Closely correlated | -2.75% | ||
| BXP - ESRT | 74% Closely correlated | -1.69% | ||
| DEI - ESRT | 73% Closely correlated | -2.67% | ||
| AAT - ESRT | 71% Closely correlated | -2.58% | ||
| VNO - ESRT | 70% Closely correlated | -3.36% | ||
More | ||||