It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ESSA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePFIS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ESSA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFIS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
ESSA (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.04% price change this week, while PFIS (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.18% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.51%.
ESSA is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.
PFIS is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
ESSA | PFIS | ESSA / PFIS | |
Capitalization | 179M | 295M | 61% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 3.752 | 18.595 | 20% |
P/E Ratio | 9.49 | 10.90 | 87% |
Revenue | 68.7M | 101M | 68% |
Total Cash | 32.7M | 39.3M | 83% |
Total Debt | 372M | 75.6M | 492% |
ESSA | PFIS | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 83 | 20 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 39 Fair valued | 74 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 46 | 43 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 48 | 44 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ESSA's Valuation (39) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PFIS (74). This means that ESSA’s stock grew somewhat faster than PFIS’s over the last 12 months.
PFIS's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as ESSA (46). This means that PFIS’s stock grew similarly to ESSA’s over the last 12 months.
PFIS's SMR Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as ESSA (48). This means that PFIS’s stock grew similarly to ESSA’s over the last 12 months.
PFIS's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as ESSA (49). This means that PFIS’s stock grew similarly to ESSA’s over the last 12 months.
PFIS's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ESSA (40). This means that PFIS’s stock grew somewhat faster than ESSA’s over the last 12 months.
ESSA | PFIS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago42% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago69% | 1 day ago58% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago57% | 1 day ago74% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago55% | 1 day ago45% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago60% | 1 day ago57% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago65% | 1 day ago63% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago63% | 3 days ago60% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago55% | 20 days ago57% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 1 day ago54% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago50% | 1 day ago57% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
TAGDX | 17.42 | N/A | N/A |
Transamerica Large Growth R6 | |||
PAILX | 8.22 | N/A | N/A |
PGIM Jennison Intl Sm-Md Cap Opps C | |||
NIEYX | 14.42 | -0.09 | -0.62% |
BNY Mellon International Equity Y | |||
LAFSX | 19.11 | -0.14 | -0.73% |
Lord Abbett Affiliated R4 | |||
OAYEX | 18.17 | -0.21 | -1.14% |
Oakmark International Small Cap Advisor |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESSA has been closely correlated with PFIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ESSA jumps, then PFIS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESSA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ESSA | 100% | +0.60% | ||
PFIS - ESSA | 68% Closely correlated | -1.55% | ||
MCBS - ESSA | 67% Closely correlated | -0.58% | ||
TRST - ESSA | 66% Closely correlated | -4.26% | ||
FCBC - ESSA | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.72% | ||
RBCAA - ESSA | 66% Loosely correlated | -2.09% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFIS has been closely correlated with TRST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFIS jumps, then TRST could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PFIS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PFIS | 100% | -1.55% | ||
TRST - PFIS | 78% Closely correlated | -4.26% | ||
UBSI - PFIS | 77% Closely correlated | -2.49% | ||
FCBC - PFIS | 77% Closely correlated | -0.72% | ||
THFF - PFIS | 76% Closely correlated | -2.86% | ||
CTBI - PFIS | 76% Closely correlated | -1.35% | ||
More |