Ad is loading...
ETNMX vs RLBAX
ETNMX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts ETNMX vs RLBAX
Eventide Balanced Fund
Price$14.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets378.89M
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$34.02
Change+$0.04 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.05B
ETNMX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ETNMX vs. RLBAX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ETNMX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 234B vs. ETNMX (379M). ETNMX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: ETNMX (1.81) vs RLBAX (1.28). ETNMX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: ETNMX (10 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than ETNMX (1.09). RLBAX (44.00) and ETNMX (43.00) have comparable annual turnover. RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ETNMX: RLBAX (250) vs ETNMX (1000). ETNMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.60 vs. RLBAX (3.92). ETNMX return over 5 years is better than : 40.60 vs. RLBAX (32.45).
| ETNMX | RLBAX | ETNMX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.31 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.31 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.288 | 0.154 | 187% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 379M | 234B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.81 | 1.28 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.60 | 3.92 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.44 | 19.69 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.60 | 32.45 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 44.47 | - |