Ad is loading...
EUFN vs FGB
EUFN vs FGB Comparison
Open Charts EUFN vs FGB
EUFN vs FGB Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EUFN vs. FGB commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EUFN is a Buy and FGB is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EUFN has more net assets: 3.45B vs. FGB (58.2M). EUFN has a higher annual dividend yield than FGB: EUFN (32.060) vs FGB (-5.795). EUFN was incepted earlier than FGB: EUFN (15 years) vs FGB (18 years). EUFN (0.48) has a lower expense ratio than FGB (4.58). FGB has a higher turnover EUFN (5.00) vs EUFN (5.00).
| EUFN | FGB | EUFN / FGB | |
| Gain YTD | 32.060 | -5.795 | -553% |
| Net Assets | 3.45B | 58.2M | 5,924% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 4.58 | 10% |
| Turnover | 5.00 | 27.00 | 19% |
| Yield | 4.17 | 8.51 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EUFN | FGB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 82% | 11 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EUFN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EUFN has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EUFN jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EUFN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUFN | 100% | +0.92% | ||
| SAN - EUFN | 84% Closely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| BBVA - EUFN | 81% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| NWG - EUFN | 78% Closely correlated | +1.69% | ||
| RF - EUFN | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.66% | ||
| PRU - EUFN | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.02% | ||
More | ||||
FGB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FGB and MAIN have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FGB and MAIN's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FGB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FGB | 100% | +0.78% | ||
| MAIN - FGB | 7% Poorly correlated | -0.15% | ||
| ARCC - FGB | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.29% | ||
| NMFC - FGB | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.68% | ||
| TCPC - FGB | 5% Poorly correlated | +1.41% | ||
| HTGC - FGB | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.63% | ||
More | ||||